Then a studio should pay for his movie, with a share in the profits, and accountability and legally binding contracts.

how many lives did you waste learning how to complete it in one life?

I wonder they decide which loser-with-a-dream kickstarters they're going to plug as "news?"

Get involved, Internet. Upvote it.

"whiplash in repose" is pretty funny.

The Stefan joke sort of sputtered out, there. You need the part where he goes "That's that thing where…" and then cracks up because something insane was written on the cue card in the last 15 seconds.

Too soon!

I watched Heath Ledger prepare. I saw Heath Ledger's performance. Heath Ledger WAS the Joker. Sir, you are no Heath Ledger.

And on the off chance that you do end up with a product, you don't have to share the profits with the people who paid for it.

I just think you could pick an easier place for this fight than a situation where the actor playing a character says that he has an intuition about his character that exactly describes a recent storyline involving that character. You think it's a coincidence, I'm really in no position to contradict you beyond my…

That's pretty speculative… he's playing the Joker, I think it's a pretty safe assumption that not only might he have read some comics recently, but he's probably had a thousand conversations about the character with writers, directors, and producers.

What does that have to do with attributing his awareness of a recent comic book arc to his mysterious Joker-intuition?

He "gets the sense" that the Joker is older than people think from the extensive comic book storyline where it's revealed that he found one of those resurrection wells 400 years ago, and is immortal.

I sort of object to this comment "white people who were probably never asked to fall into a relatively offensive stereotype the second they got to their auditions."

I thought you said you had researched it and agreed that there was a backlash. Now you're back to saying it doesn't exist.

I'm 45, I care as little as you do about them.

The story isn't that people complained - the story is that Kristen Wiig mentioned it in an article. Again you're talking about something that nobody has actually said.

Well the article does explicitly dare the reader to come up with a reason for not liking it other than the fact that it's women.

ya, I'm responding to the article, which dares you to have a reason other than misogyny for thinking it's a bad idea for a reboot.

Ya, the AV club writers definitely have an agenda, but I don't think it's movie marketing. Like this article dares you to have a reason that the reboot is a bad idea, other than misogyny, as if there aren't a hundred reasons that a Ghostbusters remake is stupid.