There's a part during the Crazy 88 fight where all the combatants are silhouetted and everyone's flipping around and there's a woman Crazy 88 member with long hair who gets brutally dismembered but every time I see that I forget it's not the Bride.

This was the first movie with Parks I'd seen, and the simple fact that he played dual roles told me he was something special.

Surfs off an elephant's back and down its trunk

"Stay back! I have a history of violence!"

I really believed her in the scene where she was crying and typing.

I haven't heard a single person respond to negative feedback about this album without implying it's due to that listener's inability to grasp complexity.

He also hasn't seen Star Wars and will let you know every time you see him.

Well now we've gotta put Arthur on the table.

Joke's on you. I was quoting Greil Marcus!

Will you accept "I listened to the album and it wasn't for me"?

Funny to think their ex-drummer released an album with a twelve-minute track of him repeating the same verse pattern over and over without a chorus just a few months before they released an album of slightly too-long songs that lack any apparent structure.

That's my problem with fan theories in general: they usually involve doing logical backflips all for the sake of not having to suspend one's disbelief.

If it's anything like the comics, the first half will be every Marvel character ever entering the scene and talking about how tough Thanos is.

The glowing steel thingie? It's prolly the MacGuffin they're fighting the MacGuffin wars over. But the thing about the MacGuffin wars is they weren't really about the MacGuffin.

Also, I think I saw a face in the tree HDS looks up at when he's sitting on the bench with his coffee.

I have very mixed feelings about Faculty of Horror. Sometimes I really appreciate the look at subtext, especially from a feminist perspective (the relationship between feminism and horror is fascinating, as the way women are treated in these movies wildly fluctuates), but then one host sidelines the conversation to…

It's the problem with aggregating reviews in general. A movie with a bunch of "good but not great" reviews can look like the second coming of Christ, while a wildly divisive movie at the #1-of-the-year spot for the 50% of reviewers who didn't absolutely hate it looks like a complete dud.

So does Rotten Tomatoes; though it's black-and-white fresh-or-rotten, you can read blurbs from each review, or click through for the whole thing.

Yeah I don't think withholding the film from reviewers is seen as a confident move.

Yeah but he's so charming on the phone.