disqusjajwzqlvmo--disqus
Dingbat
disqusjajwzqlvmo--disqus

I agree, in part. That's what made "In Rainbows" so good, though, is that they seemed to actually be having fun with those songs. Still serious subject matter, but the band felt playful. Not so austere.

I've been listening to the live songs for about a month now, and now the full album, and I can say it's a top tier Blur album.

Yup. Album is also phenomenal, so that's a plus.

Going into Under the Skin, I had zero expectations for it other than knowing it had Scarlett Johansson, and that critics had reviewed it favorably for the most part. Leaving, I knew it was a masterpiece. I haven't felt so mesmerized by a film in such a long time, probably since I saw Inland Empire in the theater. It's

There's nothing about this that makes me feel that drugs are scary. Just that drugs can make you think you're brilliant when your ideas don't really go much farther than the "lol random" peak of Adult Swim a few years ago. Try as he might, Wayne Coyne is not Jodorowsky.

Well, that was aggressively awful. I mean, I knew it would be before I watched it, but hoooo boy, I don't think I was prepared for quite how bad it would be. And I liked their last album.

Dan Harmon drinks celebratory wine made from the sourest of grapes.