Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    disqusj7gezbtvbj--disqus
    K4
    disqusj7gezbtvbj--disqus

    If this doesn't happen in the movie, I'm going to be disappointed:

    Whilst that would be perfect casting, you have the issue that after the enchantment is broken, the prince is still a beast.

    I still want to know if Angelina Jolie's cheekbones in that film were CGI. I kind of think they had to be but have never been fully certain.

    Well I wasn't going that far. I was more just going with the traditional image of Belle resting her head against this big bearlike chest and these massive arms protectively around her. It just always strikes me as a very romantic and warm images. Like what girl doesn't want a giant wolf-bear-thing to guard her. It's

    The flaw with Beauty and the Beast movies for me, is that in every version I have seen I find the "Beast" version of the prince more appealing than the human version. Beast is this big fierce, loveable huggable strong cuddly monster. And the prince is just this skinny poncey guy.

    The issue isn't whether a character is White or not, it's that you consider Japanese and Chinese people equivalent as the alternative because both are Asian. Japanese was specifically called out and when it was pointed out the movie is set in Hong Kong you made an argument that both were Asian so it still counted.

    It's legitimate because you can support your point with argument.

    I wouldn't say it's a good thing. Pence is a great deal more alarming to me than Trump. He seems to believe in the divine superiority of Israel and generally be a nightmare of prejudice and dogmatism. Trump is just a populist mouthpiece.

    Where two become One.

    I remember watching Spitting Image as a child and remember
    that song you talk about vividly. I think to any reasonably empathetic person, it's relatively easy to feel sad for someone, even Thatcher, when you see them disappointed or lonely.

    I also think people don't get how much mockery backfires. Especially when it is demonstrably false. Anyone remember that SNL skit with Tina Fey pretending to be Sarah Palin talking about seeing Russia from her front porch. Many people who hate Sarah Palin for whatever reason were passing that around as hillarious. It

    Yes, Trump is a horrible human being, but lets not eulogise Hillary Clinton. She is a hawk who is militarily aggressive and was one of the key proponents of bombing Libya and turning what was North Africa's most successful nation into a failed state. You know, it can be neither.

    Ha! I'm going to concede this point purely for the mental image you have conjured of Sir Robert Peel arguing in parliament that the British must secure Hong Kong's Dental Sibilants. :D

    Bad Science is not the same thing as Science. It's not even a subset.

    Also, was an investment banker at Goldman Sachs. An institution that has probably done more to subvert the American democratic process than any other single entity in the USA.

    Imagine trying to perfectly time a grab onto a railing when you can't see your hands or run along a wall when you can't see your feet. :)

    >>"The downside of course is that her body is property of the government."

    Wait, she had a full-cybernetic body as a child???!!!?!?. That's stunningly cruel. What did they just keep replacing her body at intervals forcing her to relearn coordination and balance with each sudden jump in body, along with accompanying body-shock? It's hard enough dealing with the changes to your body when you

    The Age of Ultron one will be hillarious!

    Not a case of slowing down a song, but if you want to talk commercials, I don't think I've ever heard anything more flat-out wrong than when Mercades-Benz used Janis Joplin's "Mercades-Benz" for their own.