From the look of the trailer, it's pretty close to full animation already. Even the actual humans look like CGI.

Am I really the only person who hated Source Code? Sappy, incoherent junk.

Way ahead of you.

"But the AV Club does it!" is not a very convincing defense in this case.

What's a way that doesn't spoil at least some nature?

Say what you want about the tenets of conservationism, at least it's an ethos.

If the Icelandic wilderness didn't want people looking at it, perhaps it should have dressed a little less revealing? Would it hurt it to put on some trees?

And the planet is only habitable once. Unspoiled wilderness is pointless if no one's there to enjoy it.

It's not a hard question really, the answer is "fan theories". As evidence, I present the over-excited presumed adult referred to in the article.

What's more weird and creepy, adult coloring books or adult fan theories? Discuss.

Those vanilla council creeps have gotten to you to, eh?

The biggest difference is that one was relevant 20 years ago and the other 15 years ago.

Probably because it isn't, it never is.

The Gulf War wasn't a movie, it actually happened.

Not only are you wrong, you are Wrong on the Internet.

Uncharacteristic candor from Kyle.

He should've had the lasagna.

Not much of a pilot though.

Take a look at what's implied about the hobbits' value system and tell me they wouldn't vote straight conservative.

They can't silence the truth. Whatever that was, something about a shitty magazine. Didn't really read the article to be honest.