Does anyone find it interesting that in the first episode there are 3 victims of crimes (murder, kidnap/murder, attempted murder), and each of the victims is a white person? That's RACIST!!! For another example, please see below quote.

I may have committed slight genocide.

It's not statutory rape, if there isn't a statute prohibiting it. By modern laws, yes, but by the laws as instituted by GRRM, it wouldn't be statutory rape.

The show also didn't have any gay men in the opening 8 minutes. Why was that not addressed in the first sentence of this article? Is the lack of homosexual characters not something that we need to address in re: machismo in the CID precinct? It's a real slap in the face to the gay community. Should I feel slighted…

What do you think "This isn't as damning as it sounds" means?

olivececile: Surely you read the A.V. Club's review of the episode. If not, I suggest you start with the first sentence ("The only female presence in the first eight minutes of True Detective is a corpse.") and work your way down to the last ("Stare long enough into the paradoxical void of the episode’s title,
spend…

Can we please stop talking about the story and go back to scorching this show for not immediately showcasing any female leads?

Naw, playa.  Im talkin bout tha Choomer in Chief.

Buffett endorses yet another sociopath with a drug history.  This one is a teacher, though, and not our 44th President.

"The Men Who Built America (History, 9 p.m.): Spoiler alert: They finish building it!"
******
False.  They didn't build that.

"The Men Who Built America (History, 9 p.m.): Spoiler alert: They finish building it!"
******
False.  They didn't build that.