disqusibgsxfe2lr--disqus
Data
disqusibgsxfe2lr--disqus

I really do wonder what that six season plan looked liked that Sam Schaw always insisted upon. I mean, sure there's lots of stuff about the nuclear uprising that could have been told going forward. But there wouldn't have been a lot of the original cast members returning, right?

Also know as the incredibly cute Katja Herber. Because, seriously.

You know, I'm not going into this whole 'mysigony' debate with you, so let's just say: I disagree with your view.

Binging this show might turn out to be a chore. It's a very well made show but personally I usually feel highly exhausted after having watched a single episode.

'In all fairness' might not be the most elegant way to lead into that sentence, but point taken.

Yeah, I know abou that. But even Williams talked about Aladdin once in a while. Have you seen a single interview with Atkinson discussing LK or his role in it? If it wasn't for his name
in the end credits he might as well not even have been in it, at all.

And yet, James Earl Jones…

True, I didn't consider the agent's fee.

A-ha! Anti-Adroidism!

Yeah, yeah. This is were actors usually lose me. I will never understand how you can walk away from any job in this industry - from voice work, especially - because you feel underpaid. You're either aspiring and do anything they'll give you. Or you're established and sure as hell make enough so that you're never

You can say that about any movie. I was talking about the artistic reason behind doing a remake. I mean, aside from filling in a couple of gaps (like, why the servants were staying with the Beast in the first place, since he was always so mean) the movie didn't really do anything to justify its own existence. It was

Greedy bastard.

Walken was my favorite part about it. 'My ears got ears' still cracks me up.

Plus, he's been mysteriously absent from anything Lion King related since the original. And I can't seem to find any explanation online as to why that is.

Jungle Book was actually pretty great. I didn't see the point behind Beauty and the Beast. And Lion King seems to be on a similar track.

You're pretty sure? Based on what?

I thought the book was fairly entertaining but could have used less 'Aliens did it'.

I never heard King use the word phenomenal when it comes to Kubrick's version. Like, the man hasn't got a single good thing to say about it. Odd, considering he's endorsed greater trash based on his books.

No, no, no. It's spelled 'Bill Skarsgard' but it's pronounced 'Throatwobbler Mangrove'.

No. But it's still pretty gay.