disqusibgsxfe2lr--disqus
Data
disqusibgsxfe2lr--disqus

As most feminists are, of course.

Yes, I got that. I still prefer whole sentences over a series of quotes.

Not a man of many words, huh?

Both are cartoons and can therefore get away with lots more than a live-action show ever could. It's just in the nature of the genre. Besides, neither of them premiered 30 years ago.

You know, I was just about to type a post that covered some of the same sentiments that you wrote about.

Plus, it wasn't like the women on this show were these poor victims of mistreatment that you should feel sorry for. Peg and most of those feminists that would often protest in front of the shoe store were shown to be rather nasty individuals, themselves.

If by sexism you mean Al calling Marcy a chicken and having not tits? Nah, those never get old.

I'm often wondering that, too. And then I find myself laughing again (often hysterically) at some of the episodes I happen to catch. And then, that's what really matters in a sitcom, isn't it?

You misspelled Corall.

Or else.

I loved the first season for how great it looked, for how violent and funny it was and for that over-the-top villainey that Jackie Earle Haley brought to his role.

You know, I don't doubt any of that. But that doesn't change the fact that it's still Harry boring Kim.

I liked Voyager just fine. But dude, come on - this is probably the last Star Trek show I would ever revisit. And literally nobody ever said 'My, what about a Harry Kim Spin-off? That was a character worth spending more time on.'

Well, Raphael was never a regular to begin with. And reducing Cece's role in the show to simply 'the love interest' is selling both the character as well as the brilliant actress a little short, don't you think?

With me, it's farts I can't hold.

What? Both Zooey Deschanel and Hannah Simon are still on the show as regulars. And both are quite whacky enough on their own.

I didn't mind the symbolism with Sam, because he served a very specific purpose. Sure, he was such an obvious bad guy who didn't deserve anything but what he got. And I agree, that leaves no room for tragedy, considering he was introduced for no other reason but to be an asshole and be murdered for it. I thought that

That opinion is nonsense because it's based on mere speculation. As you have pointed out correctly, no one has seen it, yet - including myself, of course (never said otherwise). So, it may turn out to be a dud and it may not. It's all up in the air, so there's really no need to feel sorry for anyone involved, as of

So, you've seen the entire show already, I take it?

Yes, there is Netflix everywhere else in the world.