PS
You call your notes the ideas file? So does every writer have something like that? Thanks to a screen writer friend of mine, the guy I mentioned going to UCLA I call mine the treasure chest because it is my treasure trove of ideas, unfinished stories, and lines I may use for future stories. My buddy gave me…

Oh my god If I doubted you were a writer before (which I didn't) your analysis leaves very little doubt. I tried to watch some of the Moffit stuff but for me it was like an Anita Blake moment where she goes to a crime scene to examine the evidence and rather than see what is before her, her mind tries to un-see the…

Let me start off by apologizing. I misread your comment about the publishing thing in terms of publishing houses. Of course you know what I misread =). I was being lazy about going back and editing that. I have a Dr. Who question for you. Are you talking about the Russel T Davis era of writing which would be the 9th…

Actually your information is appreciated. You said you had 3 of your 5 books published which obviously means you're a lot further along than I am. I'm still in the stage of sending it out and them saying no. They are nice about though, rather than say it is terrible I get "its not the right fit for our agency" or I…

Allow my to clarify my statements a bit. If a writer is paying an editor to "edit" their work chances are its a scam. If a publisher buys their work they have professionals on their staff doing that as part of their job. They find the mistakes or issues and send it back to the writer for corrections. A number of …

Actually I am looking into publication. I have a book finished and am working on a follow up. Is it that obvious I write? Or was that an educated guess ? =)

I confused the two. Copy editors in journalism do things like rearrange the article or cut or even add so the piece fits better. Editors in writing check for errors, missing words, sentence structure. I had a brief run in with journalism as my major before I got my degree in creative writing.

Not at all. I will point out that using your logic since you said they used a piece of the story or (canon) Character to build their own not so original story then that sir is either A: Fan fiction or B: they retconned the original flash show since they did take part of the story and the character or rather mark…

PS. I didn't mean to post 3 times. My reply wasn't showing so I assumed it didn't go through

Fine then how about this. Either They reconned the original 90's show to fit the steaming pile of poo that is Flash 2014. If that is the case they reconned the original story then said that was canon. Or since the writers of flash 2014 only used part of the original story and pulled mark Hammal's trickster into their…

Fine then how about this, they reconned the original canon (the 90's) show to fit the pile of poo which is flash 2014. Either that or the 90's show is canon since it did come first and since this show only used a part of the original canon and not the whole that makes flash 2014 nothing more than bad fan fiction…

Then how about this, they retconned the 90's show to fit what passes for their show. In keeping with that what was reconned was then made cannon for the purposes of what passed for a story. Either that or the 90's show is cannon and the 2014 show is bad fan fic written by fan boys that while it exist, has nothing to…

Exactly when did I critique someone's spelling? Whatever grammar or spelling mistake I made if someone pointed it out I thanked them and edited accordingly. Now in that same token if someone pointed out a grammar or spelling mistake as a way to denigrate my arguments or intelligence and dismiss what I wrote on the…

Are you calling it a troll because its an opinion that is contrary to yours and actually thought out? I voiced my opinion and backed it with information from the show and the episode. I haven't called anyone a name or made any personal attack to anyone who has responded although name calling and attempt to demean my…

By the way thanks for catching that type O. You know how easy it is to miss a word or two when typing a big body of text. Writers do that all the time, it's why they have editors after all. I hope you didn't think that lessened my intelligence or my point's. Some would consider that a weak way to try to win a…

Thanks for catching that. They referenced the 90's show quite heavily which puts it in the realm of canon. But there is a lot of harry potter and star wars fan fiction out there written by fan boys and girls who put their wishful thinking to paper. Officially it doesn't exist because the creators of the original work…

Well if that is the worst he could find in terms of a rebuttal then the body of my "rant" is sound. Type O's doesnt lessen my intelligence and to try to point out a couple of simple and understandable mistakes is a cheap and weak way to try to win a discussion. Here is the thing, writers make type O's like this and…

Alright two and it should have been obvious I meant write not right considering write and writers is seen numerous times. I wrote a huge body of text so it's natural a type O happens. Professional writers do that and more all the time which is why they pay editors. Thanks for catching canon for me. I missed that.

So one word in a very lengthy worded text… nothing about the points themselves. It should be obvious if that was the only word they found it was an over sight. If that's is the best rebuttal they can give I'm fine with that.

I don't know if you're a native English speaker or not but I believe the word you were looking for was Would not Wood. Wood is what a tree is made of.