Hm, I wouldn't call it terrible. It did serve as a decent set-up for next season and put the focus back on the characters.

Hm, I wouldn't call it terrible. It was a good set-up for next season and put the focus back on the characters.

But it's the Internet!

LOL, this made my morning…thanks.

"relentless condescension, moral absolutism and unfailing tendency to proselytize"

He uses that episode title in all his shows.

Do ex-CIA directors working in the private sector get assigned bodyguards? Would be interesting to document.

I don't think this season's action sequences and thrills have "contort[ed] logic and sense," so I guess it's a taste thing.

It's been doing this for years now….let's just evaluate the show on its own merits instead of constantly bringing up S1. S1 was slow-burn because of the nature of the plot, the whole is-he-or-isn't-he. They could probably do it again if they wanted to.

I blinked at least couple times in the slow-motion montage where they actually show Trip's face and body crumbling to ash.

Why is this always the place people on these boards go to when someone takes issue with their position? "Yeah, you don't agree with me about X, so you must BE X." It's reductive, illogical, and unoriginal to boot.

Don't think there has to be a winner per se.

You are reaching here. His whole point was to explore the reactions of others to an alleged rape victim. A "viewer" to the victim as it were. How we approach the accused,

Are any of us spearheading anything, or simply commenting in vain in a vacuum?

Lol that could apply to use of the word "fixed" as well.

Calling Bellevue right now.

Whose groupthink takes precedence?!

Can anyone on this site make a point without ad hominem crap? It makes you look like a 5 year old, and undermines your entire point which is overreaching besides.

Aww why?

Internet discourse 101.