disqush4yjhze4mi--disqus
someladyontheinternet
disqush4yjhze4mi--disqus

All these comments and not one 6 Degrees joke.

So true. The article mentioned plot and I'm thinking… I mean, I remember a bunch of cats get introduced and there's one sad cat who wants to go to some afterlife place but she's a gross old so nobody likes her but then she gets picked anyway and she rides a rocket-powered tire into the sky and all the cats sing about

Most people haved named all the classic movies I would, but my husband and I recently saw HARDCORE HENRY in a theater with D-Box seats. A gimmick movie for a gimmick theater seat. It was totally worth it, more like a theme park attraction than a movie. Don't get me wrong — this is not a good movie. Misogynistic,

Omg. Yes. It's just… so much color. Exploding color and fast things, everywhere.

Knowing how hard those actors worked on the duel makes it even more amazing.

Never saw on a big screen with a rowdy crowd: Grindhouse. From what I've heard from others who saw it this way, it was perfect in a cheap theater with a participatory audience. Ditto for Final Destination 5, which was in 3D.

Haha. Nah, just still on a con high, I guess. XD

People are criticizing his books here in the comments, but you could do worse than pay attention to Kevin J. Anderson on the subject of bestsellers. Dude has a huge list of book titles to his name, either as author or editor or both, and a not insignificant number of those have sold extremely well. I also had the

Plot twist: he was Jesus all along!

I would read that.

Wow! Yeah! That must have been it! You figured it out!

Re: Matrix - I don't know, people who don't like fun? You're the first person I've heard in a long while who didn't automatically groan at the mention.

[deleted by user]

I'm not trying to "school" anyone. The comment seemed to indicate you weren't aware of *what* Star Wars was when it was made. But if you're between 20-30, that would place you in the age group that didn't care much for it in the pre-prequel era and just after, so it's understandable.

No, no. I have to totally disagree with this. (The bit about SW itself, not the criticism of JJ, with which I agree). People younger than 40 can't grasp what made Star Wars so special in the first place. Younger generations are so used to seeing everything Star Wars influenced that they can't see it how the first

Yes! Good god. I couldn't stand the fact that any resolutions to the original trilogy were completely ignored. Han? Back to being a jerk. Leia? Doing the same damn job she's always done, no character development at all. Luke? No satisfactory ending for that guy. I know, let's take the most traumatized character and

You would think so, but JJ is not known for narrative coherence.