disqusgx13x9bzqt--disqus
Morrigan
disqusgx13x9bzqt--disqus

I've posted here all of three times and yet you claim to know me and my relentlessness. Don't you have anything better to do than build your little database of hatred and anger, and keep it well fed and watered? No, you don't. That's why you're here. I'll pray for you.

Didn't read the scold past the fold.

No, they talk excitedly about when all the evil old white people will "die off" and the world will be Utopia.

The corner in which ignorant people use nouns as verbs (orgasm, gift) and make their sexual inadequacies the fault of evil white — wait, I DEMAND to be called "of noncolor" — straight people.

Good job throwing a bunch of irrelevant distractions into the mix. I responded to a poster who said all was awful during Reagan, and since your inane opinion doesn't matter and therefore your inane insult had no effect, you tried then to pick fights about my calling of colors by the term they have chosen and

I seriously just (with a type, whatever that means) called people of color. That is what they demand to be called today.

My goodness, there are a lot of angry, failed, broke posters on this site. No wonder. When you curse the darkness, you get more darkness. So when you get angry at someone who worked hard and it paid off for her, you sentence yourself to another ten years in Mommy's basement.

That's right! But you are! You just said so! LOL!

No, it really doesn't. I'm white, female, no college degree, often times had to work longer and harder than my of color "team" because management didn't dare ask anything of them, never dreamed of taking money from anyone else to pay my bills. The truth, simple and blunt, angers you, and that shows a systemic

I'll certainly agree that the disastrous abandonment of mentally ill citizens was shortsighted and devastating to this day. Ditto the wars.

"So" the loser is incredibly unqualified, appeals to bigotry, appears to have an unstable temperament, and conducts herself in an embarrassingly crass and vulgar manner when she thinks no one's watching. Ask the Secret Service. Oh, and she's ready to keel over. All those skeletons she's made are grinning at her.

It was fine for me. But then I never quit a job without another one, and didn't go out and "empower" myself by becoming a "single mom". Oh, and I also kept up my education in my chosen field instead of partying my working years away. Not saying you didn't do the same as I, just saying that people's choices have

I block a couple of cumbersome trolls on my local site, but I usually use it for people who never have anything of their own to say, but only post screen shots of other people's tweets or pix….every 7 minutes.

Interesting angle. They could call them "girls," without the "little". There seems to be no age at which a girl is no longer "little". Well, wait. When they reach 18 or 19 they're called, redundantly, "young girls" (as in "we must protect young girls from all men everywhere!"). One, that presupposes that there

Dude, what are you getting out of this?

Except for Aleppo, they're all fiction. While I'm not familiar with most of the references, I'm betting none of the fictional little boys were dreaming of their wedding day and calling it the happiest day of their lives! Didn't the Dutch boy save the city from flooding? But a Little Girl would have done nothing but

It might be a generational idiom too. I'm in my early 60's. I hope younger people are more enlightened. I didn't see that story, but there was the photo of the 5 year old boy in Syria (?) sitting stunned and bloodied. But those kids, at least, were real. Most of the Little Girl stories are fiction or heavily

As are you, since you jumped in.

I think if you listen, you'll hear the discrepancy. But as you say, everyone's experiences are different, so maybe not. I never hear parents say, "I have a daughter and a little boy," but I do hear them say "I have a son and a little girl." For that matter, I rarely hear "girl" without the word "little" prepended,

Yet you keep coming back, weakling.