disqusgaaittdubb--disqus
NameWithheldByRequest
disqusgaaittdubb--disqus

Indeed. Fortunately, in this particular case, we don't have to depend on Putin's honesty or lack thereof. The utter lack of evidence to support the Russia-gate conspiracy theory speaks for itself…

I know. I mean it's not like the CIA and FBI and Clapper have ever lied to us. That's why we should accept their assertions based purely on faith. Evidence? We don't need no stinkin' evidence!

… it goes counter to her earlier inability to kill the walking dead in the first season.

Yeah. I'd be great if we had some actual evidence to prove that Putin is lying.

Bill Maher lost his mind years ago. The only thing that surprises me is that anybody still gives two shits what he thinks. As if his Muslim-bashing and Hillary deifying wasn't bad enough, but he's still flogging this Russia-gate conspiracy theory nonsense. It just goes to show that you don't have to be a theist to

I agree. Once you plunge headlong into the conspiracy rabbit-hole, where reason, logic and evidence become extraneous, anything and everything becomes possible. Russia-gate has all the hallmarks of a cult, wherein the "truth" of a belief is accepted uncritically, regardless of the lack of evidence, and all who express

Yeah, Maddow and Olbermann will be claiming to have been skeptical about the whole thing from the start, just like Trump was against the Iraq invasion in 2003. What's sad, though, is how many people will probably believe them. It goes without saying, of course, that no one who's been feeding this Russia-gate hysteria

Did Symantec have access to the DNC's servers? Were they able to independently confirm Crowdstrike's findings? The reason I ask is because, given Crowdstrike's lack of credibility, especially after its report of similar Russian hacking of Ukraine was exposed as fraudulent, any analysis that relies on claims made by

It wasn't "well forged," it was completely amateurish. And the mainstream media has been producing fake news at least since the USS Maine blew up in Havana harbor in 1898, and was subsequently exploited by the U.S. media to justify the war against Spain, even though there was no evidence that the Spanish were

There’s no hard evidence here…

…have both shown that there’s big box office potential in letting creators break out of the punch-and-explosions mold.

Kinda liked the Pilot, and the next two episodes are fairly good too. No way can this ever be compared to Under the Dome, a show that was batshit crazy from the get-go and really, really stupid. This, at least, is more competently made and acted. And so far its avoided the random townsfolk showing up with pitchforks

On the positive side, it will almost certainly be impossible for anyone to make heads or tails of anything that comes out of Cosby's mouth. Shit, I couldn't tell you what the fuck he's saying in his "comedy" routine, let alone when he's spewing rape apologetics.

What kind of trauma would ever make anyone want to subject themselves to a Transformers "movie"?

…“blow up the humans, then chase them, then fall in love with them, and then have a bunch of weird, possibly mental sci-fi orgies.”

Demonizing a foreign enemy won't solve the problems in the country. It may make some people better able to cognitively process Clinton's defeat, but it won't do anything to ensure that it doesn't happen again. Just like nothing good came from red-baiting, in which people like MLK were accused by the authorities at the

I'm sorry this has happened to you and you've descended to this level of intellectual dishonesty. I really am. I'm even more sorry that it spells disaster for the country because there are so many out there who would agree with the types of tactics you're using here. One day, you may realize what you're doing. At

The more the "Russia-gate" conspiracy-mongers try to claim possession of The Truth, the more apparent it becomes that they wouldn't know what it was even if it kicked them in the ass. When future generations look back at the type of nonsense people are falling for, I wonder whether they'll laugh at the absurdity of it

You're the clever one, ain't you? Yes, you are.

Really? So you're in possession of evidence that Russia "hacked the election"? Well, congratulations. Such evidence is a precious commodity, given that no one else seems to have any such thing, and even Clapper and Brennan and Diane Fienstein have stated that they've never seen any such evidence. You should contact