disqusfhfsrn2dy1--disqus
David
disqusfhfsrn2dy1--disqus

My guess is people read the article more thoroughly and realized he was implying someone was sexist for not wanting to see a movie, which is pretty disgusting and not even defendable.

Does it matter to you that he already drew this line in the sand in 2007?
http://cinemassacre.com/200…
"There's been talk that younger actors such as Ben Stiller will be playing the new Ghostbusters, and that's something that I don't think a lot of fans will be happy about. Because we want to see The Ghostbusters."

Nope, and this article itself is more evidence of it.

All over in it. Here's a line.

Yeah, a guy who makes videos for his opinions made a video about his opinion.

He has reviewed other trailers and came to the conclusion that he should see the movie. But I suppose if I was a stupid person, I would see that and say "Only negative reviews of a trailer are weird and wrong."

No one will be able to answer this, especially not people who write articles like this and people who like them.

Quotes like this

It isn't weird. It's called a trailer review. And yes, it is of course reportable news on his youtube page what he thinks of the trailer and whether he's interested in seeing the film.

It's time to get a new South Park reviewer for the site. That was easily by a wide margin the best episode of this season.