And maybe she is the terrifying 'mother' from ep 3.

I feel like metaphor vs. symbol is an important distinction for Lynch. But, yes.

Was the figure that created Bob the same figure that destroys the couple in ep 1?

Also, lots of Lincoln tonight. Don't cross Lincoln. Dirty Coop drives a Lincoln. The neckbeard who needs a light is a professional Lincoln impersonator.

FWWM puts Leland back on the hook. That was always my take.

He is the very spirit of unwillingness.

Well, the people answering you have seen it so… Make of that as you will. That's what happened.

She gives the secret diary to Harold after this.

David Lynch is going to take his god damn time sweeping up. Good for him.

Don't disrespect black women.

We could just read io9, I guess.

I apologize for too quickly dismissing your sarcastic comment. Donald Trump is president and irony has died.

I'm so sorry you had to read a woman's opinion on the internet. Are you OK?

Don't get greedy, Mojo.

Jerkoff.gif

I agree. I'm not surprised people find this frustrating. We are THIS close to Twin Peaks and it's still out of grasp. Also, where THE FUCK is Audrey Horne? Half exploded? Is that new Horne her kid? Did Dirty Coop father that kid, maybe?

You're right. I am right.

This is all I'm saying.

It was over 20 years ago that I gave up hope on ever returning to Twin Peaks and discovering Coop's fate, and yet people can't sit through two weeks of The Adventures of Dougie without going online to cry about it. Have some perspective.

He isn't in the scene then. Also, this has nothing to do with the main contention. What could your point possibly be?