This is why the heroes have to keep fighting heroes.

I thought he created Echo, and maybe the Hood?

Or resolved by throwing wacky super science at it. Though, TBF, he did a good job of showing how Roberto had become a very good strategist in ANAD.

It's the one where we are shown incredible upheaval in the cosmic order, with almost no sense of consequences, dangers, urgency, etc.

Outside of Kate, the original Young Avengers have not fared well at all.

Yeah, I get that, and I don't mean to be the fun police, but it's like — cotton candy should be a sometimes food, not 90 percent of my diet, you know?

I believe he either Roberto himself or one of his AIM subordinates called him Citizen V at one point, but he's mainly just been wearing a suit and tie.

I enjoy that he's literally referred to as both Sunspot and Citizen V on that "Previously On" page.

They decided to "retire" from superheroics and Roberto bought them a condo in NYC. It's in the final issue of New Avengers, IIRC.

This is how I feel about a lot of Ewing's books. We clearly love the same obscure characters, but everything feels an inch deep and a 1000 mph.

I liked Moffat's version of *Jekyll,* hope this is similar.

And I took it as if she was sincerely telling Gordon to watch himself, rather than that she was being jealous or catty.

Eh, I thought it was interesting to get her impression of where Kimmy's head is at, and how that informs how she portrays her.

A guy gets completely, impossibly covered with arrows. I mean, I don't know Aesop either, but …

My point wasn't that it was disposable, but that the viking fight was not particularly jarring or out of place given what came after.

I think the myths are supposed to be tonally jarring. They're myths. I expect them to all be over the top. (Plus, it was like minute 3, and minute 1 had a guy covered in arrows, so it's not like there was a lot to compare it to.)

The amount of blood is the equivalent of the size of the fish in a "the one that got away" story.

Goldie Vance

Nck Jr.

I don't like how whenever a book "harkens back to the original material" — Steranko in this case — it's automatically considered a good thing.