Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    disqusecusvg1tch--disqus
    guy
    disqusecusvg1tch--disqus

    that just makes it legal, not right. His estate is obviously not him, because he is dead and cannot consent

    I can see the complaint as this must be studio meddling.. This premise would be perfectly acceptable if this was a horror movie..she learns the truth gradually and sets up some cool philosophical ideas. (he is alone with lots of people frozen..the temptation to do what he did would be great vs. basically ruining her

    1000 percent yes

    I made a legitimate criticism of their list based on their own article. I stand by my comment.

    no, and your attempt to create an echo chamber is part of the problem. Not everyone agrees with you guys, deal with it

    your attitude is a perfect distillation of the problem. If you do not like politics in everything..bye! Um, no, just no.

    The fact that they actually wrote number 2, which they insult 70 million people and then complain about number 3 (no one likes the media) is one of the most blatantly ironic things I saw on this sight. Do they even read what they write? Do these people even live on planet Earth? I really think all of them somehow

    eh, I think a piece of music is much different then recreating a dead person to be in a movie. Maybe if 200 years go by like your example, then maybe people in 2200 will shrug, but now it just seems tacky

    that the left seems to forget every day when they write these kind of Trump bashing reviews

    I do not think they are admitting the prequels were bad and therefore do not exist, regardless of your hopes. They are cannon

    good or bad is irrelevant. The problem with it is SHOULD they be doing it. Why not just recast the actor? How do we know he would be okay with it? He has been dead 22 years. What if they reanimate someone and the movie stinks? Would the estate still be down with it? Doubtful. There is something just wrong with

    I noticed that lack of kiss too..it was weird, what are they afraid of? If I were to be blasted to death, I would rather go out with a bang

    I do not think it was just whether the CGI was good or bad..its more like the guy is dead, and has been 22 years. Its just weird and almost like exploitation of the dead. We have no idea what Cushing would think or how he would feel about this. What if they reanimate a corpse and the movie unequivocally sucks?

    I cannot believe after all these movies, we really finally see Vader as the terrifying villain he was supposed to be in action..easily the best part of the movie, by far

    eh, I thought the Tarkin stuff was pretty disconcerting. Maybe because unlike other CGI renderings of "younger" actors, Peter Cushing is dead and has been a long time. I do not know why, but it was very disconcerting to me, like looking at a risen ghost. We do not know how he would feel about his likeness being

    I found the "Peter Cushing" and "Young Leia" scenes weird and off-putting. I am baffled what the studios think they are getting with this (besides not having to pay old and/or dead actors). Like if they hired another person to play Grand Moff Tarkin, do they really think the audience will care and say. "no way, its

    I just don't care to look, move on, geesh, you are lame

    yes there was and I don't care, your opinion is noted

    problem with your analysis is they did not have Lagertha say any of those things. If she said I hate all these darn foreigners, then of course I would agree.

    You sound like a five year old. You do not come on a comment section where people talk about a show and demand everyone agree with you. Plus you cannot block or flag people for disagreeing with you. Get over yourself