Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    disqusecusvg1tch--disqus
    guy
    disqusecusvg1tch--disqus

    yep, my pick too and perhaps biggest omission, which was surprising because AV Club is well aware of her and sings her praises. The fact she is so good in a mediocre show as the lead makes her performance even more outstanding. So many people in her spot could have phoned it in after being dumped to the CW after her

    I do not know if it is intentional..but wow not good

    I think Arrow has flashes of being "good"..but the Flash? Sorry, not since season 1. It hit me what screen presence Benoist has in the four series crossover they did. When she was on screen, all the other characters basically disappeared and they are leads of their own shows. Her screen presence is basically

    Have to vote for Melissa Benoist as Supergirl. She IS basically that show and I was pretty shocked she was not on the list. The show is not very good (after the first great two episodes this year it became apparent this was a bait and switch and it quickly became CW cheesy and bad.) Maybe that is the reason she was

    agree. Her nomination last year was ridiculous. I watch the Americans and think it is great..but c'mon, really? She really was in literally one scene and it was basically a cameo. It was not only an insult to the people on the show, but to other actors on other shows who were not nominated.

    exactly

    oh, I know there is still real story of his kids..but I am speaking this show and artistically. There are plenty of Ivar stories (the whole heathen army..look it up for those who do not know the story)..but do I want to watch this show do it without Ragnar? Meh Some stories are just one character's journey and this

    not to mention doing this after 20 years (on the show) looks pretty random. You are poking into some real "PC" -bs with your criticism. Any powerful women character on any series is basically sacrosanct to reviewers and they just have to gush all over them or they are afraid they will look misogynistic. Any

    I do not think this show will survive the loss of Ragnar. Fans here are giving the "sure we will watch" spin, but what people say they will do and what they will actually do are two separate things. I like this show, but as I said last week, this is Ragnar's story and none of his sons are really compelling enough to

    Poor Steven Segal..but he gets to say, "My movie would have been a big hit, but for the studio putting it up against Star Wars!!" LOL

    nah, that story is told. They are not going to re walk that road. The first two prequels had problems (I thought the third was fine and a great Star Wars story) The first's mistake was resting the story on a child actor (not his fault) and the second was a complete lack of chemistry between the leads romantically,

    I disagree with the premise of the review. Fans like to pretend the prequels do not exist, but they did show (and more precisely heavily implied) there was lots of problems with the jedi order and the republic before the empire. It was not intentionally "evil" but more like overlarge and incompetent. They also

    that is my opinion and others. I am in the minority but I thought it was a a total retcon of the character of Alex (who was ogling Superman just at the start of this season). There is too much PC stuff about blindly praising these kind of stories. It was well done and I admit it, but I thought it was out of place

    Yep, I like South Park, but this season was a turd sandwich. Its like they quit with "oh, geez" no Randy, Kenny or the member berries, the best joke of the season. I think they were all tied to Mr. Garrison losing and him going back to Mr. Garrison and the whole plot they felt did not work so they basically threw

    if you sounding like an uneducated moron who swears at people as argument is "having my ass handed to me"? I do not think you know what that means. Look it up

    yawn

    yes, this episode was pretty poor, right when it is supposed to be firing. We will probably learn more later, but I think the election was bad news for this show and exposed the weakness of them doing shows so fast and in line with current events. I think it is clear whatever "big plot" they had in mind was

    not really, it is funny reading whiny comments from the dustbin of history, so good for you guys

    Only had three, so who is the chump?

    I didn't read past the first sentence. Stuff your political opinions. Its boring.