Yeah, he did a good job too. The amazing thing though is I didn't even know who Leonardo was back then and I actually thought they had found a retarded person to play the role. I read elsewhere that others thought the same thing. That's how good he was because it would have been a very fine line to knowing how far…

I've always loved this show. It always had a film noir feel to it, even during the opening sequence with the flashing lights and the guy with the flashlight looking around. The garbage you find on ID now, with overdone recreations, can't hold a candle to CC.

Agreed. The cinematographer makes the actor look good and vice versa. Same with the editor, and the effects people, and so on. I guess to answer your question, people don't go to the movies to pay attention to the editor's work, but go to see who is on screen.

I've not seen Revenant and I'm sure it's a good film. But Leonardo got royally screwed back in the 1990s when he *didn't* win for his portrayal of Arnie in What's Eating Gilbert Grape. Every scene with him in it was perfect. When I was reading about the Oscar situation for him, I looked up who beat him that year. …

I look forward to seeing it. I like textured movies where they take you back in time and the horror/spookiness is an added bonus. As for this critique - and all critiques for that matter - I just like to get a little bit of a feel for what others think, but the final level of liking it or not is my own.

I always thought Karen did a wonderful job in Scrooged. She played the idealistic ingenue perfectly in that film and if I had been the Bill Murray character, I'd have married her in a heartbeat.

A well-made film with good acting all around. I'm not sure why the author made a big deal about ABC having a "movie of the week" vibe with this film. I welcome that as I *never* watch their and other networks' TV series. Too formulaic compared to what I can find on pay channels (Showtime; HBO; etc.). Dreyfuss did…