disqusdchtxdkub5--disqus
Christopher Adams
disqusdchtxdkub5--disqus

Just read it. Basically suggests that it is possible that other people could have killed Hallenbach based on circumstance. Still no hard evidence, DNA or otherwise, points to anyone besides Avery. Imagine you sat on the jury and heard the evidence for the case in a dry and clinical manner and did not watch a

I agree—I'm not excusing the cops planting evidence. I'm simply speculating on what really happened rather than discussing the ethics of the investigation. I feel like, based on what the doc shows, Steven should have been found innocent. However, if we had sat on the jury instead of having viewed the case portrayed

I think the thing that throws most viewers off about this case is that drama forces us, or conditions us, to look at one side as good guys and the other side as bad guys. If Steven is good, the cops must be bad, and vice versa. If the cops are crooked, than Steven must be innocent. This is the illogical belief that