Sure, instead of putting some reasoned opinions together and having a conversation your approach is far more deserving of people's time and consideration.
You really took the high ground, there. And i feel like I've been put in my place by a real thinker.

"this is from a guy that liked Daredevil Seasons One and Two and Jessica Jones despite the fact that those shows had HOURS of footage that was unnecessary and repetitive and wasted time."

obviously not really really easy, or they'd do it.
also, the act of watching a film is a real big suspension of disbelief, as you're watching a fiction on a screen in a removed setting. extending that slightly to make allowances for small difference in accents doesn't seem like much more of a stretch.

"vintage Guy Ritchie"
i'm going to have to stop you there.

i feel the same about Aronofsky. he's a hack, but he operates on, apparently, a more high-brow level so gets away with it. it just shows how uneducated the audience is.

We have professional critics to communicate thoughts and opinions in ways that are more informative and considered than that of a normal viewer.
That's the point of them. That's supposed to be the point of sites like this.
Other than that, really good post.

I can't be bothered to track down the one I was thinking of at the behest of someone on the internet i don't know, while I'm actually busy. Google threw this up though, so at least two critics have said it

yeah, it's become a regular thing. it's still bullshit. movies and tv often hold back the good stuff until the end and those things can totally change what you thought of earlier events.
take Mr Robot or True Detective. things that seemed irrelevant or awkward in early episodes took on a whole new meaning when you…

Iron Fist season 2 confirmed. Marvel deal still has 2 years on it. what are you trying to say?

no, you don't have to watch hours of something to form an opinion. but we're not talking about "shit" that is "boring". the reviewer still gave this a very decent grade. we're talking about small criticisms that are being presented as gripes, but are things that might actually be there for a reason.
the best…

i've read elsewhere, written by a critic i trust more, that Iron Fist works surprisingly well here. the comparison made was with The Hulk. doesn't work on his own, but really works as part of a group dynamic. and i can see him working as the kid brother of these more grizzled characters.

oh, man.
the writer is autistic himself. big deal, so am i. something i've learned, and i wonder if the writer has ever gone to an aspergers group, is that THERE IS NO SHARED ASPERGERS EXPERIENCE. every one is very very different.
and i've sat next to people who are so incredibly textbook Aspergers that they seem…

critics have only seen the first 4 episodes. don't trust any review until next week and the writer has at least SEEN them all.
you actually WANT the characters to be awkward in the first half of the show. you want them to be super friends from minute one?
no. you have to earn that. and that would come… in the second…

"four episodes watched for review"
it's only when you've seen the whole thing you can properly talk about pacing. things that seemed unnecessary or unneeded can eventually reveal to have had real purpose.
imagine judging Mr Robot season 2, solely from seeing the first 5 episodes.
ridiculous.

the tone of this review is amazingly pretentious.
"…although our culture keeps getting more intensely ironic all the time, we’re not quite yet to the point where this level of artifice is easily digestible".
jesus wept.

go back to his sitcom days (Spaced) and he was already doing it then. so not a zeitgeist thing at all.

best Punisher is in Daredevil. has this person not seen it?

he means compared to some punk who knows zero.

"Does it really?"

oh shit. i really am now living in the world of THX 1138.