Thing is the whole Cooper wanted to save Laura and failed reading seems like something that people see in retrospect after seeing the last episode. Cooper didn’t have an obsession about saving Laura, he was sent to Twin Peaks to solve the case of her murder.

Thing is he was merely executing what the “unknowable” instructed him to as shown us multiple times throughout the 18 episode run including episode 8 which establishes Laura was sent on earth with a purpose. Cooper by the finale was merely helping to fulfill Laura’s destiny as the unknowable envisioned for her.  

But none of that has anything to do with Cooper’s intents. It’s all the Lodge’s machinations of which he’s merely an executioner. We were shown Laura was the chosen one by the lodge. Saving her was the lodge’s machination because she had to fulfill whatever they needed her to.

It’s not about the intent, or better said what people assume it to be, it’s about the result. Even more so because Lynch doesn’t provide us with a guide about how to perceive/interpret his work.

That’s part of what of what I had in mind, thanks for sparing me the time.

I don’t know, it had a cliché ending of something that is expected to have a sequel.

As much as I liked the double episode finale I don’t think it lends itself to the intellectualizing it’s getting.

I do think the creators knew what they wanted from the revival, it’s just that they didn’t strike the right balance between the various elements of the show. It’s not merely Cooper that was missing but the fact that too much time was spent of what is essentially an exercise in style. The slow scenes went from being…

I think we’ll end up finding out that Laura was also a tulpa which may be what she told Coop in the black lodge. This seems to be subtly hinted in the revelations about Diane and Audrey.

The state and size of his base has been always ambiguous in various ways. It’s supposed to be a varied group of people who gravitated towards him for a variety of reasons. If we are to assume this to be true than separate sections of his base are prone to react differently to his tenure as president. I think there are…

I believe these kind of meetings are what you’d call a circlejerk.

There’s a degree of inevitability to this. The only way for his most faithful associates to recover from the Trump grope to some degree is to turn against him in a very substantial way which will happen because they will be offered tons of money for tell alls and similar.

This is actually inevitable. Trump (and his family by extension) was first and foremost a brand. That brand is dying a slow death and will never recover. It can rebrand itself by dropping the Trump association but this again results in the Trumps being separated from their brand which again results in them being…

so unfair, so unfair

He has the best words, believe me. He can’t spell them to save his life, but he has them.

Tomi, darling sweetie sweetie darling. No one gives a flying fuck about Hillary’s e-mails and second you are on mainstream media.

It’s kinda like the postcards people made out of pictures of “strange fruit” bore by southern trees. It was so that the horrific heritage wouldn’t be covered up.

Auschwitz too still stands and if someone decides it should be torn down, it’s not neo-nazis who are going to be protesting. Nazi monuments are long gone.

Which benefits the right exclusively.

The false equivalency applied to both extremes extrapolated from the totalitarian regimes to the current incarnations of the ideologies is standard populist bs which isn’t uncommon throughout Europe either. Here’s why it’s bs. Starting with the premise that all totalitarian systems are an abomination ruled by crazy…