But haptic visuality and corporeal feminism are actually arousing?

I totally understand. Plus, douchebags would probably jump on you for using "loathe" when you meant "loath".

So… how about that Lisa Kudrow?

Lorne is making me forlorn!

It depended. Boards for foreign/classic/indie films were almost always civil, articulate, and thought-provoking spaces for real discussion.

First IMDb and now this? Why the fuck can't intelligent internet-users have nice things?

It blurred the line between Tina and your avatar scarfing down pie in a "A Ghost Story".

It's not the sequel to "Never Let Me Go"?

I wonder why.

It has many connotations, but it can mean over-investing something with meaning to cover for or allay loss. I believe that is what is happening when adults obsess over children. This sense is also pretty damn apt when considering the picture in question, which evokes loss in a profound way.

Why do people use that site? It sounds like the Wal-Mart of porn. Gross.

This picture in particular may not be the most exemplary, but yes, the over-investment in and elevating of the perceived cuteness of children is a kind of fetishism.

Great, but what a cloying pandering picture. Enough of fetishizing children/babies. Pets too.

Weird ≠ Surreal.

Does Laemmle?

Another, in the spirit of my choice: "I Want to Live!" (1958)

"American Psycho".

What is the best movie title to encapsulate this administration? I will start: "I Wake Up Screaming".

I read it as "British newscaster dies inside surfing dog." Might be the wine.

You're right, it's permissible to excuse past racism/sexism because "things were different."