>If a car dealership sold a car to a person without checking his or her paperwork (like if the person had a proper active, license or multiple
DUI's) and that person then drove that car and killed somebody, wouldn't
the dealership be held accountable?

Nothing in the act provides immunity to either retailers or distributors from actual specific negligence claims or manufacture defect strict liability claims.

Czech Republic to my knowledge has some of the most relaxed civilian gun laws you can find in Europe or the Eastern Bloc. You're almost like the 'Merica of that part of the world - even the word "pistol" comes from your native tongue and the CZ line of guns is rather well respected in American gun ownership circles.

Aw, we made such good progress too. Shame.

Okay you've stepped up from dick-jokes to scrutinizing a less than perfect grammar with my use of a verb in noun-tense. True, a word like "rebuttal" would have been better there.

Google the success of it yourself. The reason why its less efficient is because they don't successfully run away.

"I'm stumped and have no refute, so I'll make a juvenile sex joke."

>Gun control is a public safety law that infringes personal liberty in
the pursuit of public safety, and only the most rigid and unrealistic
ideologue takes a hard line against it.

So you're conceding that your logic regarding gun manufacturers is comparable to the sort of logic that was both (1) stricken down by the courts as illegal discrimination and (2) considered objectionable by modern left/progressive thinking.

>What relevance does that have?

>Run

You are aware that people like Michael Bloomberg have guards who use NFA-registered weapons, right?

Yes, and it is a term that does not accurately describe any gun that has ever been sold on the civilian commercial market in the United States since 1986.

What's the NRA going to do?

They were aiming for rogue theories of civil liability.

"Based on FBI data estimates"

They aren't called assault rifles. That is a politically loaded term from your side.

1) "Standard Background Checks"

Actual slander/libel and incitement or direct threats are the only matters of speech that are allowed to be punished/banned outright.

"I failed to get enough votes through the ordinary legislative process/actually having better voter turnout than the gun-rights centric demographics so instead I'm going to subvert the judiciary to do a legislative act."