disquscr8v7ksl9x--disqus
Norton
disquscr8v7ksl9x--disqus

But he's not a geek at all; he's an arrogant romantic with a God complex and a scalpel who thinks he's better than everyone else. The forthright way he speaks, the unwavering confidence in his work, his ego… he's not antisocial at all. I agree with the notion that it would've been an interesting take on him (the

I believe so. Look, it's not horrible—I've seen worse shows that like to take themselves seriously despite how horrible they are—but it still suffers from lackluster characterization, inconsistent pacing, and flowery dialogue. My main problem is Victor; I don't know what they were thinking when they "re-imagined" him.

God, I really want to like this show but I just can't; the writing is that bad. The dialogue is just so clunky and unbearably stilted, and the characters are completely lackluster, with no substance or meaning providing them "new life" beyond the gratuitous supply of shock value they like to shove in our faces. The

You're a poet

I don't know, it was just that I thought she was fairly developed and fleshed out in this one. I mean, that scene when Matt is beating the crap out of the person who killed his father, that was when we really got to see her getting a rise out of that stuff. She actually enjoys it, takes some sort of pleasure in

Disagree

A bit. But it comes a little too late for any resonance, you know? I mean, the second we find out that she has a daughter-someone she was looking out for and whom she loves—bang! She dead.

What would be a more realistic Catholic then? How would Matt act in real-life (I'm asking because I thought the show did a fantastic job at blending human emotions with absurd situations; almost kind of like asking "What if this were real? What if an actual Catholic man had these specifics in his life? What would be

Ha! Yeah, I get your point. Still, I don't think that objecting to or disliking a poorly written or even underdeveloped female character in the comic-books is true sexism; after all, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and you can't possibly know why they think a certain way in regards to those feelings. No, I

Yeah, you're right. The fire effect on her face was still cool though

I'm done with DC movies after suffering through Batman vs Superman. Sorry but . . . yeah. Even if all the other ones are great, I'll never forgive the one that came before. The new continuity doesn't help either.

Yes. Yes they have. Why do you think it took so long for a Deadpool or Punisher live-action performance to crop up again? There's just not that many well-known, popular female superheros out there. I honestly don't think sexism has anything to do with it.

Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! One of the best things about the show so far

Nah, that didn't bother me. I mean, Karen specifically said they weren't labeling it. What bothered was how dysfunctional the pairing was. But maybe that's a good thing— maybe it makes the relationship more realistic and complex and fleshed out. Unnerving, yes, but you have to put aside your feelings and your

U r my god.

Ummmmmm…. the fact that he saw Claire's face smothered in fire that one time…….

Damn. You a Murdock hater?

Whhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttttt???????????

That's deep man. Just . . . deep.

Wait, hold on. In the comics, Kilgrave can excrete a special pheromone from his pores which makes its way into his victims and make them highly acceptable to any command. I agree that the whole virus thing in the show was messed up—and that they should have just kept with the original—but is it so unrealistic, if