disquscfmia43pnk--disqus
Mirn
disquscfmia43pnk--disqus

Great. Thanks. I was wondering about Cornwallis was doing there, but was too lazy to look it up. The peace he negotiated in 1802 between England and France was indeed a temporary truce in the Napoleonic Wars. But he was also the guy who put down the Irish rebellion of 1798. But, in both cases, as Flynn states,

Thanks for that info. I wonder if the writers checked into it.

I'll grant that the depiction of Benedict Arnold wasn't bad, and the idea that he could have become acquainted with David Rittenhouse and his experiments in wartime Philadelphia is more than plausible. But the episode still left a very bad taste in my mouth.

Thoroughly agree!! I was so disgusted by their turning a scientist and patriot into a villain that I may stop watching altogether. It's like turning Ben Franklin into a monster (although that could have been more fun because everybody knows him). And to make know-it-all Lucy ignorant of who David Rittenhouse was is

This really was the best episode so far. All the other stuff I was impatient with sort of led up to it. But, no, I don't really want a full Mike and Ginny romance just yet.

"The body count on this show is growing far faster than I expected." Yeah, I'm a little concerned about the body count, too. I may be wrong, but it seemed in the earlier episodes as if Flynn restricted his killing to victims who were destined to die very soon, anyway—in the Hindenburg or the Alamo. It requires a

You're right. Big potential problem.

Being very history-minded, I thought of David Rittenhouse as soon as I heard the name and figured it was a consortium named for him rather than an individual. But Rittenhouse is a "good guy" in American history, so it does bother me to have something nefarious named for him.