I think it goes much deeper than that but again, I never said I was personally in love with them. Simply stated what occurred. I could be a staunch communist and still have written what I wrote word for word. Tis not indicative of one's ideological stance to merely state facts. Sleepy Gary needs to learn that. He…

My comment had really nothing to do with the validity of threats, the sanctification or endorsement even of Trump's recent ban. I was simply trying to show that the comparisons are absurd. Much has changed since then (Adolphus's immigration here) and to act as though a particular stance especially with regard to the…

Off the top of my head… Pew study.

Again your downfall is your selective reading and this constant tendency to lump people into categories then debate with that instead of the facts at hand lol. You've already stated, or better yet parroted many of the ignorant uninformed mantra's all liberals like you parrot. You ignore the STATISTIC that immigrants…

Jesus it's like debating with a child. "They BELIEVE in sharia but don't infringe upon your rights". You clearly KNOW NOTHING about Islam. Not an apt comparison, Feudalism to Sharia law but then again you are not interested in understanding comparisons as you have continually made erroneous assertions and read WAY…

I also noted ILLEGALS in the list along with immigrants and refugees however, much to the convenience of your highly limited and specious argument you chose to overlook that and continually compare it selectively. You my friend are the dishonest person. Selective reading and straw man are most certainly your modus…

Take it however you like. You clearly do that frequently lol.

Gary Gary Gary, bless your heart. You remind me of my school days. You continue to read so much more into my statements. I never said immigrants and refugees do not embrace free market principle as you imply and then refute lol. (yet ANOTHER straw man). I can assure you sharia law is not open to a free market…

You love to create STRAW MAN arguments then tear them down lol. I NEVER defended his policy, yet you have erroneously now categorized me as a Trump defender of everything he has ever said lol
Sleep Gary I suggest some Aristotelian logic. Maybe use that "imperfect means" It'll get you there.

You most certainly did not refute ANYTHING I stated. However it's obvious you want to now play semantic and philosophic games which I am not interested in doing. You do know one word is not a sentence right? See, I can be cool just like you.

Inconvenient? Not really, just tedious and subjective. I'm also not interested in debating who was the meanest mafia crime boss. Countries, cultures, their ideals, values do shift over time too you know? Just look at the united States.

No, you seized upon ONE word and morphed my argument into simply that. I also countered your straw man very succinctly. A simple Google search will reveal my statistical sources. ( You do know what Google is right?)

That's clearly beyond the scope of what I was commenting on. I'm not interested in engaging in a debate about what middle Eastern country is or is not potentially dangerous.

Well done grasshopper.

Yes you clearly countered them all with your infantile adjective "bullshit". Color me impressed aside from the laughter of your statement.

Care to have a COGENT argument that's not PUERILE and BASELESS?

Clearly reading comprehension is not your strong point. The "legality" of entry was not my sole point of contention as you seem to state. My point was that it's not an applicable comparison to make, certainly not at this particular time in history. FYI: Many terrorists have posed as refugees to gain entry here and…

How can one be "required" to embrace free market principles? Kinda defeats the purpose of a free market if made compulsory ay?

Such wisdom you speak Anton. No doubt an Ivy league grad.

To each their own, UNLESS you're under SHARIA LAW.