greenwald is "left" in the sense that he consistently critiques the us government's authoritarian excesses, not in the sense that he wants to seize the means of production and depose the monied elite.
greenwald is "left" in the sense that he consistently critiques the us government's authoritarian excesses, not in the sense that he wants to seize the means of production and depose the monied elite.
name one major publication or media outlet that allows the actual antiwar left any airtime or content space. you have to go pretty goddamn far down the far left rabbit hole before you'll find anything consistently critical of the military industrial complex.
that's not kneejerk anger it's an appropriate response to a crime against humanity.
"we" can't lead from the left because "we" are not left and lack the credibility and commitment to addressing the issues that facilitated all three branches of government being dominated by right wing authoritarianism. "we" being the democrats, who are guilty of literally everything the gop is only more with more…
the dude clearly meant "liberal" slow your pedantic balls andrew
that analogy is garbage and you should be ashamed of it
maybe if the united states wasn't the #1 exporter of death on the planet people would be a little less cynical but idk ymmv
admitting that america is run by killers isn't the same as being a trump apologist. what a bunch of incredibly obnoxious mcarthyite bullshit.
why do you want to be lied to? how are we supposed to confront america's crimes if we get mad when people speak of them out loud?
nah, it's valid and that's a thought-killing cliche. trump is too inarticulate and morally atheistic to have a point but regarding our russian policy it's fucking rich the way we characterize them while funding actual terrorist organizations and state sponsors of terror and our long, long history of being cozy in love…
the nsa is an imminently trustworthy institution, well said lol
what is the meaningful difference between those two statements in regards to the thousands of dead bodies and displaced families and trafficked sex slaves and so forth?
i mean uh we do spend more on killing than anybody else and drop tens of thousands of bombs a year in eight different countries and our elite super operatives in seal team six just shot an eight year old american girl to death so i guess what im saying is hm
rich and famous people get whatever drugs they ask for. if you're a real vip you can get stuff like merck cocaine. she was a drug addict and her doctor was a drug dealer. no disrespect intended.
nightcrawler is possibly my favorite movie of the last 20 years give or take
i thought you weren't a trump supporter? i'm confused now. that sounds extremely much like what a trump supporter would say.
and this contradicts with my original statement how? it's ok to display a little ideological consistency. being careless with sensitive data is bad when hillary does it and it's bad when trump does it. it's not calculus dawg.
he didn't send a letter to the media, he sent it to congress. blame the media for blowing it out of proportion. saying "there might be some more emails idk" isn't interfering with the election, it's a meaningless statement. jake tapper and his odious ilk ran with it like crazy because of what i like to call "the…
you're a fine american, claude.
wikipedia says it's made from grain alcohol and stevia. fuck that.