disqus9z3dun8yfs--disqus
Matt
disqus9z3dun8yfs--disqus

Tim, no, the editing FAIL wasn't in showing which chef did a better job. I'm not sure where you got that. The FAIL was in showing HOW the decision was reached. They made it look a number of wrong ways: to Joshua like it was based on a bad-boy-makes-good story. To me like Colicchio bullied the decision. Clearly though

Joshua thanks for participating in the comments! If you don't think that the point of having immunity is to save you from elimination, then I must ask what is the point of having immunity ?

Hey Joshua, great article , though I'm a little confused about what exactly it is trying to say. You rightly point out via the link to Colicchio's tweet that the voting determined the winner, so the actual result was legit. So we agree that the fault is in the editing, but the reason you list (that the judges were