Again, he likes 24. How does that fit in your narrative?

You seem triggered. What is the agenda that you believe Josh and everyone at AV Club supports and how did this episode not follow it? He also expresses several apolitical criticisms of the show in this review. Josh is a fan of 24, a show that is overtly pro-neoconservative/Deep State in its point of view. How does…

Holy shit, you *are* serious. Your big "scoop" is from a alt-right troll who reported Hillary Clinton was running a pedophilia ring out of a pizza parlor and had Parkinson's disease. He's a rape apologist and racist who whines about "white genocide" on Twitter. This is the guy you think should get a Pulitzer because…

A few folks? Uh-huh.

"Scoop"

Can't tell if serious. Poe's Law.

Um, the main animating force of the right is hatred of liberals and everything they consider to be liberalism. Well, that and self-victimology.

Fragility noted.

That you think my comment isn't relevant only proves my point. The topic of discussion is terrorism and US security. Any such discussion naturally should include the topic of Caucasian right-wing terrorists because, again, they are a bigger threat domestically than jihadists. But conservatives who constantly bleet…

I'm more concerned about angry conservative white guys with stockpiles of guns. They are a bigger domestic terrorism threat than Muslims. I think we should pause allowing white guys to have guns until we figure out what's going on. That might offend some people but we shouldn't let political correctness jeopardize our…

I don't really see a lot of hate here (except from the actual review). Most people seem to be on the same page as you in regards to expectations for this show.

This one doesn't age well, either.

This comment has not aged well.

Right. The neocons of today are for smaller government insofar as that means spending less money on services for working people. But those savings are diverted to deficit-busting spending on tax cuts for the wealthy, war adventurism and crony capitalism. Libertarians tend to like the first thing but not the other two.

He's actually not entitled to a bit of privacy if he is doing the work of the people so tell us specifically who's he's meeting with, what they discussed and allow photographs. If he's not doing the work of the people then tell us he's golfing for leisure. Can't have it both ways. Or at least a normal admin wouldn't…

They are that, too. But I'd say libertarians clash with neocons much more often than they do with the ultra-rich economic Darwinists, whom they mostly support. To wit: Koch Bros.

Libertarians are economic Darwinists.

He essentially confirmed the veracity of those allegations when he apologized for "bad behavior" and literally said: "Where there's smoke there's fire." So GTFOH with that "highly convenient" apologist bullshit you pulled out of your ass.

Could you say this again? I don't think you were clear the other 20 times. Thanks.

Republicans have been pretending W. Bush doesn't exist since Jan. 20, 2009, when all of our problems magically began thanks to the black Democrat. Now they pretend that not only did none of those problems improve, but that the country is in ruins because of the black Democrat, and now their authoritarian daddy is…