Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    disqus7s6ax5kza7--disqus
    DMW
    disqus7s6ax5kza7--disqus

    "Expecting every program to adhere to one, easily understandable format …"

    I don't mind that people disagree and then say so. What I find funny is when people have to get so mad about the fact my opinion is different from theirs and get so defensive as you and the other dude has. Relax, fanboys, I said the show was made for you guys who read the comics. Seth Rogan as much as said he made the

    Poor baby. I'm sorry you like a shitty show. But don't get so mad at me for not liking it. Do you need the number of a good therapist? You seem to have issues…. LOL!!!

    You make it sound like we should be surprised about a boy being named "Cooper", but it's quite a common name. In fact, it is the 57th most popular name this year and was 77th most popular last year. And, according to a baby name website….

    "This is a show that is going to explain things down the road." - And you know this how? Do you work for the show and have insider information? Have you seen unaired episodes? Or are you just assuming?

    I thought it was a flashback too and it confused the hell out of me. The idea that those guys were not human or could be regenerated never even occurred to me. But then again, I never read the comics so I only know what they bothered to tell me in the show and nothing in the episode suggested that identical replicas

    Your review explains exactly why I'm not going to keep watching the show. I didn't read the comics and it felt to me like it was made solely for people who have read them. I was confused by both scenes you mentioned. If a show can't be bothered to give the viewer some idea what is going on they cannot be surprised if

    I thought about that, but that happened before the boaters arrived, so Madison had no way of knowing she did it. The worst thing Madison knows that Celia did was approve of Strand committing suicide, which doesn't make her a danger. Besides, the church people were gearing up to attack her plantation when she poisoned

    Classic concern troll. If you really were motivated by thinking I had been unfairly mean to someone, then the logical thing to do would be to reply to me saying "Hey, that's just rude and was uncalled for." But to respond with just an insult and make no mention of why you were insulting me shows no support for someone

    1) About Celia's loose screws. But as angry as she was at Strand she just ordered him to leave on his boat. She did not lock him up or try to kill him. Celia was not a danger at a level that you need to murder her. In fact, she is so anti-murder that she was angry about Strand shooting Thomas. Madison comes off as

    All die? TWD season 1 - The nursing home gang. They were all alive last we saw them. Season 2 - Hershel's farm. The Greene family was fine and escaped the horde attack with them. Season 3 - After the Governor is defeated the prison welcomes a whole busload of people who didn't die. Season 5 - After the showdown at

    Yeah, I agree. Madison's decision to kill Celia was far more extreme than people seem to think. Celia not only did not threaten to hurt anyone, she had already agreed to let Nick and his whole family stay. The woman was offering Madison safety and food and Madison kills her because she thinks Celia is a bad influence

    No. Because my comment was a continuation of a the discussion above. By paraphrasing nella's trollish comment back to herself in reply to a long post she made about the show I am indicating that she is being inconsistent. Before she posted an insult premised on the idea that a discussion of the details of what happens

    When someone not already involved in a conversation jumps in to post nothing other than an insult, that's trolling. Your comment here was a sincere question, so not at all trollish.

    It's a zombie show spin-off. It isn't trying to be Ingmar Bergman. Get over yourself.

    That was bad, but what made it worse is that it was so unnecessary. They obviously had their hearts set on the "Travis sees a book in English, figures out the guy is lying about not speaking English, so concludes he is afraid to talk, which can only mean Chris is hiding in the back room" moment, so they thought they

    So you think that if a show isn't Bergman that it's wrong to point out when someone is complaining about something that didn't happen, but that they think happened because they were not paying attention? I'd say you need to go back to troll school, because that was weak tea.

    Classic troll. First you make a comment that shows you aren't even paying attention, then when called on it you blame the show for your inattentiveness. My guess is you used the last brain cell long ago. I'm sure that's the fault of the show too … somehow….

    Wow. You out-dumbed yourself. DANIEL is the character played by Ruben Blades. His mother is not a character in the show. You are confusing him with NICK.

    It wasn't a typo. Read again….