Great points…I'll ask, how can a porn star be protected should he/she choose not to engage with someone who doesn't/hasn't used condoms? Legislation is fun for everyone, but the realities of the business have to come into play…

Umm…wait. So "men" can't take "no"??? That's sexist as FUCK. There are plenty of jackasses out there, but most men understand what "no" means.

Well said. REBOOT!

Please tell me when a man (who isn't Anthony Perkins in Psycho) has approached a woman and asked if she's selling panties.

Unless I'm mistaken, basically everybody has HPV. It's probably a 95% infection rate amongst anyone who's sexually active. I say this while pointing out that it's a fairly recently 'discovered' virus, meaning that statistics aren't going to be able to accurately represent prevalence. There's not enough science to…

I had to read that bit over because I was so dumbfounded. I'm all for hating on the pumpkin, but hot damn, Dan, give your readers some credit.

AAAAAAAHHHHHH SEKENNNNYAAAAAA

It's not bad advice from a legal perspective, just from a PR perspective. Not that people are going to stop going to Cinemark because it was trying to get paid back. It'll be because all the movies are shitty. That's why they'll stop going.

Recouping fees is a pretty standard thing in litigation, to the point that it's literally the last item in any statement of claim (the last section of which describes what kind of 'reimbursement' the aggrieved is seeking, and always at the very end is something along the line of "fees and whatever the [Justice] deems…

Bringing up nudity is an interesting issue that kind of takes things off…topic (see what I did there!?). Kyle's Mom in the South Park movie said it best: "Horrific, deplorable violence is okay, as long as you [don't show any boobs]."

I reckon I'm missing a reference because I'm drunk earlier than usual…but I don't hate Dowd, I really do think he's a strong voice.

You have successfully described The AV Club

1000 upvotes if we're on the same page, and I reckon we are.

I'm curious what show you were watching if you thought graphic violence was "not tonally appropriate" and thought that the "theme" of not killing is tedious…that's the fucking point of the show, dude.

Does anyone know where Colin Kaepernick was when this happened?

He's a very strong reviewer, but his grades tend to be on the low side to the point that he's almost short-hand for a film being underrated

I missed the judgmental part of the article and thusly don't know how to feel about it.

I was just teasing, no harm no foul, I hope :)

Not in the same way, my friend, not in the same way…

(this might be the best confluence between username/avatar/message I've seen…haven't been around too long, but still, well played)