Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    disqus5mvmqkxkbt--disqus
    DRT
    disqus5mvmqkxkbt--disqus

    On further consideration, I agree. Gus strikes a pretty imposing figure and is hyper-competent, but there's no there there.

    Yes, he scammed people before but those were jerks who needed to be taken down a peg.

    At this point, there is no good McGill brother.

    Back when I was watching Breaking Bad, I always felt, after the introduction of Gus, that the show had a deep enough bench to survive unexpectedly killing off Walter before the end if they had decided to go that route. Jesse, Mike, or Gus could have carried that show the rest of the way.

    Sometimes if you are distracted, you can see but not see though your eyes might be open.

    Ordinarily, I love his scams, but tonight was different. It's the time in the show when the protagonist inevitably crosses over into despicable behavior after we've become fond of or at least sympathetic to him all these seasons.

    I am not some alt-right jackass, but you go on telling yourself that if it makes you feel better about being thin-skinned and self-important. None of you are proving me wrong about my contentiousness critique. It's a nonstop contest to see who's the wokest, and it does resemble academia in how all the various

    Apparently, from the reactions, I am a bit out of practice.

    I come here all the time and was being facetious. I am glad you all have senses of humor. I was being facetious about that too.

    To be fair, wanting to fuck Gal Gadot is not going to make you like the movie less.

    I thought I was coming to a pop culture website to talk about movies and stuff, but I seem to have wandered into a contentious Liberal arts English Department instead. I did not get the memo that it was Check Your Privilege Day here at the AV Club. I just wandered over from the Katy Perry article comments section

    The conclusion was rather goofy and feeds his ego more. I am not saying he doesn't give it his all. He's not a natural fit, and since he usually takes himself so seriously that he'll sue tabloids for what other celebrities laugh off, I have trouble buying him as a devil-may-care wisecracker. That's Chris Pratt/Pine or

    A lot of the stuff that they pulled in the '80s was a product of both their ages and the time period. I watched Revenge of the Nerds not too long ago and a lot of their "boys will be boys" behavior that we were conditioned to laugh at back then comes off as creepy, predatory, and stalker-like now. By the time Check

    That was a clear case of improper MUSIC appropriation.

    That's because it's UNTOLD. It should have been called Dracula Uninterested.

    If Johnny Depp is invisible, how anyone be able to see his drunk gay pirate routine?

    I liked it too, but Gosling seemed far more into it than Crowe.

    Johnson did not get much of a part. SPOILER ALERT: It's a plagiarized rehash of Griffin Dunne's part in An American Werewolf in London, basically, that doesn't make as much sense as that one did.

    That movie was awesome even if it was a bit of a downer.

    Casting aside the 17% RT score, I bought a ticket for this thing anyway. The movie is almost aggressively dumb and Cruise seems miscast. As someone said earlier, self-deprecation does not come easily to him. With all the attempts at jokes and witty banter, it seems like they should have cast Ryan Reynolds instead,