This is what I also need to know.
This is what I also need to know.
Interesting stuff! It's interesting that some cultures value the display of beauty while others don't. I actually would have assumed that royal wives would have been more covered under a sort of "only the king gets to look" premise.
It's definitely a trap for Kendra. Lumped with Carter until she dies, unless he dies first in which case she can't find happiness with anyone else. Sounds delightful.
Did 18th century France have a version of Hollywood tape, or was it just breasts falling out left, right and centre?
I think the first half of this episode was better than the second, with the team enjoying the old timey West, the bar fight, Snart and Ray deciding he was going to adopt an accent and Rip off sulking in his ship out of the way.
Yeah, that was rubbish. It's bad enough that she's trapped in a loop of falling in love with the same knob time after time, but if he kicks it before her she doesn't get to enjoy the rest of her life before Savage kills her with someone else?
I was hoping, just the tiniest part, that all those years of eating an insane amount of crap food had finally caught up with the Gilmore Girls.
The one in Ireland with the goat? Oh I am all over that ;)
Surely he should have won some sort of award for taking off that helmet yet still having bouncy, shampoo commercial hair.
I heard he has an eight pack.
Love that. My other pet peeve is when people ask "do you mind if I do x,y or z" and the response is "sure". So, you do mind?
Oh no, now I don't know which of those is which.
Aren't they releasing that new Ashton Kutcher show in two batches of episodes? Not sure about in the US, but there have been some shows added a week at a time in Australia, like that awful Shadowhunters.
Not at all. If Gideon's capable of monitoring dreams, surely it's capable of doing some research in whatever timeline they're in.
I think part of it is him saving face after no doubt copping a lot of gossip/disbelief/suspicion after Claire's disappearance. I think that part could believably be an attitude from a man in the 1940s. Him being accepting of her story smacks as a bit too modern an attitude.
I can't believe he burned them, especially after being told how potentially valuable they were from the professor.
I think part of her expected him not to believe her and so she was making it easier for him to chuck her. Obviously being the 40s, she'd have an easier time of it socially with a husband that everyone would presume was the father of her kid than doing it alone, but surely it's going to be harder for her emotionally…
It was great, great, yes? Over 120 years in the future, I think that works out. Just.
It seems somewhat ridiculous that a billionaire genius tech developer wouldn't have a noticeable effect if removed from the timeline.
This issue has provoked a lot of thinkpieces in recent years. The prevalence of Brits and Australian actors usually gets put down to the training they receive at drama schools and the work they do at home first. For instance, most of the Australian actors that have gone through Hollywood in recent years usually have…