The Boris Karloff one is good. One of his best.

First Welles and then Gilliam. What is it about Quixote that makes movies about him so quixotic?

The problem with this approach, though it does probably contain a lot of truth, is that it runs into the box office problem. Everybody saw Jaws, nobody saw Aloha, Bobby and Rose.

I'd say that's a reasonably common opinion among cinephiles. The late 70s sees the transition into poppier, more teen-oriented films and the decline of the adult drama as the Hollywood staple.

And I think only in the final season did it reach that amount, after its massive popularity was firmly established.

My thoughts exactly.

"Origins of the Heir" is a really clunky title.

"It's World War I, so we couldn't." - Of course you *could* have.

He's like a real-life Terry Jones character.

Some bad movies do really well, though. It's the *kind* of bad this is, I think.

To be fair, there's a *lot* of armchair analyzing of Melania from the left. Not usually "articles," but lots of stuff like this from the internet echo chambers.

Quite possibly!

Weak toilet seat joke aside, The Orville seems to be on firmer creative footing than Discovery, and it's a pretty good bet that of the two it will be the one that's closer to TNG in tone.

Sure!

It happened, and THEN Romanticism happened.

After seeing it for the first time last week, I just want to see a making-of documentary about Sorcerer.

Maybe United did something wrong, the article does mention that they have the worst rate of incidents while transporting animals, but I'm still inclined to place the bulk of the blame on whatever weird breeder and buyer were involved in putting a rabbit on a plane.

Is that "Important" supposed to be "Importing" or something? I can't make sense of the headline. I mean, I know it's from InfoWars and therefore not ever *really* going to make sense, but…

Neither "complete" Elvish language is inspired by any particular language, though there are individual words and stems that are. The Book of Lost Tales is a good reference for some of his early work on Elvish.

Definitely nothing "Tolkien-esque" about the nomenclature, here; it's pretty artificial and "eye-cracking," to use a Tolkienism.