my bad. i thought women would be smarter than to rush to such judgements.

he says unironically, after making sweeping judgments about people based on what they listen to.

says someone who's clearly never actually listened to howard stern

you think everyone bases the worth of an entire gender based on hotness level? that says a lot about you and the people you surround yourself with.

i'm not sure where you're getting "evil" from, since i never called him that. nor did i say he hates women or that he was any better or worse than the women quoted in the article (i actually said they're all shallow). nice try though.

except making sweeping assumptions about women based purely on their looks is textbook misogyny…. which is the main focus of this article as it spends half its word count on this one guy.

you realize it can be both, right?

how's that foot taste?

then you'll probably be pleased to learn there are literally thousands of other articles on movies and TV for you to enjoy.

It's got electrolytes!

"I'd prefer news stories about movies and TV"

that lesson does seem to be missing in all of this

if you thought #12 was ridiculous, wait until you see #42.

i think best picture is determined by rank choice voting, whereas the other categories are determined by plurality.

wow, i didn't know that newswires could read in the first place

except at the end, the kids still get the halloween candy.

alternative facts, aka: cognitive dissonance.

"Ike's answer was he was giving McCarthy enough rope to hang himself."

sure, believe whatever you need to convince yourself that trump won "overwhelmingly" LOL

LOL the popular vote isn't an "irrelevant" statistic. it's just not how we select our president.