But Ragnar just stood by and let the torture of Bishop Swithern happen, and as one of the chief leaders of the raiding party, he could've stopped such barbarity.
But Ragnar just stood by and let the torture of Bishop Swithern happen, and as one of the chief leaders of the raiding party, he could've stopped such barbarity.
In that case, I'm looking forward to when the Vikings get their ass handed to them.
But isn't this after Ragnar's story?
I'm hoping the Saxons decimate the Vikings, even though history suggests otherwise. After seeing all the shit the Vikings continue to pull, with raping nuns and killing civilians, I don't see how anyone can continue to root for these bastards.
I know this already, which is why I said that Ecgbert defeating the Vikings would be historically inaccurate.
I'm sick of the Vikings constantly defeating every force that meets them. I hope King Ecgbert slaughters the Vikings, even though it would be historically inaccurate.