Yeah I guess, but one could argue that a tv show can be entertaining and shocking at the same time. Breaking Bad for example often had horrible crimes shown on screen, Walters first murder for example, strangling the dude with a bike lock…..shocking yes, entertaining yes but what it did mostly was beg the question…

Ok maybe a bad example, all I am saying is that tv shows shouldn't shy away from the shocking when telling a story in especially in a world where morality is a constantly moving flagpole. I know TV networks are afraid of causing offence but I think the molly coddled society we live in takes this too far.

You do realise you are watching a show about how the dead have risen and are killing anything they can that is alive? If they came across a baby they would have eaten it. But to nearly smother a baby is too far??? I don't follow your reasoning

Yeah totally agree as well with your point. That is really where I have the problem. Don't get me wrong I love the show and don't see that changing…BUT I would like them to adapt some of the more horrific aspects of the changes to the characters humanity. Ultimately what is "normal" now would be considered…

I understand your point. BUT in a world where the amount of time in a normal life/post apocalypse life is not particularly balanced, it is entirely plausible that Lizzy would think in this ruthless and psychopathic act would be justified. I understand its not comfortable to watch. But they are trying to show the…