Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    disqus0qbfq4w6sj--disqus
    X P
    disqus0qbfq4w6sj--disqus

    Okay, you are either just making shit up or an idiot. Slate said fuck on her very first show, and then did a whole year before she wasn't renewed.

    Does breaking character equal "Meltdown"? Please answer my earlier questions, but let me know how Jimmy Fallon rates on your meltdown scale.

    So wait, how did "not a graceful recovery" become a "meltdown"?

    Okay, here is the thing. You say there was an edit, but I just watched a single unbroken shot of Leslie Jones walking off stage, entering, and looking for her camera and cuecards as you could hear crew offcamera whisper things at her. She paused as she tries to understand with a quick hand movement/shrug and then goes

    Leslie Jones didn't "melt down" as the reviewer says, she messed up her cue, which is a completely different thing. Both she and Rock were clearly living off the cuecards (as everyone says is the only way to deal with hastily edited or rewritten sketches) and she took her exit early. It is embarrassing but please

    Jago & Lightfoot is one of BFs best series. I'm behind on them, but not nearly as behind as I am on Benny, although the way they have Benny's story flip flop between audio and books, it doesn't surprise me I drifted away from it.

    But then Dalek tries to teach the dalek how to love. Which sucks balls. Jubilee pulls zero punches.

    I grew up watching Doctor Who on PBS with the 90ish minute omnibus episodes. So for me, Doctor Who has always been about long atmospheric build ups to plot points. It is one of the things that charmed me as a tiny, impressionable person. So New Who two parters are right up my ally, especially considering that pacing

    Am I the only person left who watches a whole show before posting my opinion on the damn internet?