I don't know if the cab would get returned. I'd sure like to know.

If Naz is found not guilty, then it's done. He can't be tried again. The statute of limitations is irrelevant.

There are two suspects that don't get much notice: Detective Box and Freddie (not him, but someone from his crew).

What happened with the taxi this week? Was Naz's father selling his share? With the trial ending in just days, wasn't there a chance they could have got it back (if Naz is found not guilty)?

Me either. I keep expecting Stone to get something out of the cat. I thought maybe it ingested some evidence or something like that..

i think the expert witness said they found Naz's flesh under Andrea's fingernails.

I've also been trying to figure out if there's something more about the cat.

Freddie killed him because Naz told him that Victor was sexually abusing the other guy ( the guy who killed himself).

Naz distracted the guard (asked for a new inhaler), and Freddy slashed Victor's neck while he was watching tv.

One thing that's missing from the prosecution's case is a theory of how the stabbing went down that would explain the blood all over the wall at the head of the bed, but none or little on their suspect or his clothes, little on the knife, no footprints and nothing on the door handles.

True, true. He's a man, she's a woman….

It's Sinbad the sailor. But I don't get the connection other than him being Muslim and away from home.

If Naz did it, why didn't he have more blood on him?
But if someone else did it, why is there no trail of blood?

Yeah, but she could just go to a bar and pick up some guy. And if she wanted to comfort him, there are other ways.

The defense so far is that the prosecution didn't investigate the possibility that anyone else could have done it. But it's hard to create doubt in a stabbing trial when they've got a guy who was caught with a knife from the victim's home.

He keeps getting worse and worse and I wonder what he'll do next week. Chandra should keep her distance.

Now that he's getting flashbacks, maybe he'll see himself doing the stabbing. I'm not sure if the flashbacks were all things we saw him do in the first episode or if they're filling in pieces.

With only one episode left, it seems there were a number of dead ends. So maybe not.

There was that other murder scene at the beginning of the episode that resembled what happened to Andrea. I don't know if that meant anything, but maybe the killer struck again.

I thought there would be some blood evidence presented that pointed to someone other than Naz. Or, if someone snuck in and stab her, there would have been some blood elsewhere (a trail, or on the gate or door, or in the bathroom).