disneygator
Disney Gator
disneygator

....yes

They don’t look like it. But if their papers said ‘Dagestan’ then yes absolutely I would pull them aside.

The problem with the Needle/Haystack approach is that, statistically speaking, we really need to just focus on the shiny objects to find the Needles, but the American Needles Liberties Union and Council on American-Needle Relations won’t really allow us to “profile” needles like that, so we sift through a bunch of

Floridian here. There is literally no body of water larger than a bathtub in central Florida that does not have an alligator in it, except for swimming pools, and even swimming pools will eventually acquire an alligator or two if left unattended for a while. It’s hard to fully understand until you live down here, but

Bay Lake is a natural lake and is connected to the SSL.

the rule in florida is ANY body of water could have an alligator in it

I can see how some people might see it as a horrific title, because it could be interpreted as exploitation. The title is somewhat cold and clinical, and that often leads things open to a degree of interpretation. This woman underwent a series of terrible events, and in a way the title of the article doesn’t draw any

Wow. Very inappropriate. You need to realize that in your job people are not going to always agree with you. If you answer them with ‘fuck off’ , you tell them that you do not have the mental capacity to challenge or debate them. Thus, everyone who reads your response will empathize with frankly.

Super unprofessional...

People are being very rude to you, but I think you’re raising a very important point here: there is a major difference in the public's perception of what is described above and their idea of “abortion.” I see a lot of people commenting “these stories are why we need pro-choice politicians and judges” and “this is what

Because a 32 week old child is normally viable outside of the womb?

My wife’s best friend’s daughter was born at 30 weeks and is a perfectly normal child now at 6.

You got issues if you think it’s ok to abort a child at 32 weeks for any ol’ damn reason.

And yet another mature response from an author on the site. My god, I thought commenting was supposed to be about discussion and debate and all I get is slammed. How many times do I have to say that I realize now that I used the wrong words to describe what I meant and realize that it came across completely

Cunt needs a stiff dick up her asshole.

I’m very pro choice, way to be a complete and utter moron.

Thank you - not that you're defending me - but for saying what I didn't have the right words to say. I goofed and I'm being destroyed for it and the author doesn't have the dignity to engage in a discussion but just responds like this. Very sad.

I think the headline is intended to draw people in with a ‘wow’ response only to find out that it’s a sad, sad story about someone’s struggle. I’m not judging and I misspoke by saying I was ‘horrified’ - I meant I was surprised by it because it’s unusual to have an abortion that late - I seriously am not judging - I

Wow - I’m just so disgusted by the hate and vitriol that has been thrown at me for one comment - I said something wrong so give me a chance to explain myself before coming at me with such disgusting attacks. I am pro-choice and completely support this woman. I meant that the headline made me think that Gawker was

Wow - really nice way to engage with your readers. What I meant - and clearly I didn't say it correctly so forgive me for not using the exact appropriate words - was that the woman deserves your respect by making the headline clear about the abortion she chose to have - no judgment on my part and I'm deeply saddened

Wow - angry much? I never said anything about good vs bad - what I said was that the headline leads people to believe exactly what you are accusing me of - sort of 'how could someone choose to have an abortion at 32 weeks' and I think she should be able to have an abortion whenever she wants and for any reason. We're

You should change the headline - even if just for this woman's sake - yes, she had an abortion but she did so for a very specific reason and it's click bait to leave the headline as is. I was horrified by the title and then immediately realized it was misleading.