You’re assuming that boomers raised in postwar times are going to be comfortable getting into car that has no driver. Online banking and smartphones are a stretch for many over 70.

“the U.S. is in possession of UAP technologies, as are some of our adversaries.”

What’s a dictionary?

Trump’s on it!

Yup, I’m starting to see the ChEVy Silverado on the road, and it does look good in the metal. I’m still not 100% sold on the Avalanche 2.0 concept, but it fits well as an EV. Unique, but not ridiculous like a Hummer or CyberTruk.

There may be room for both, but I am not entertained by motorsports on mute. The soundtrack is a key part of the show.

Like the Cadillac GTP car video from a few years ago,

Any mentions of speed at time of impact? Maybe 30-40 mph? Its not really a lot of damage for hitting 200+ lbs of flesh.

Sure, Jack-of-all-trades, master of none.
As you probably already know, 3 bikes is the minimum required. One dirt, one sport(y)bike and one touring bike. Add a fourth, scooter/lightweight commuter, as you live in a dense city.

I’ve seen market share figures ranging from 2%-4% in America. Its been that way for the last few decades. Its almost like they don’t want to succeed here.

I normally love me a brown/tan leather interior, but it doesn’t fit at all with the funky vibe the Buzz has. White or black would be better. The euros get color matched interiors. Why not us?

Well that headline isn’t misleading at all... /S

This seems to highlight how autonomous vehicles cannot rely on vision cameras alone.

Somehow, I don’t get tired of looking at 911's.
I think it keeps the value of older cars up. They never really look ‘old’.

It will eventually catch up with them.

Betchya some studio already has a screenplay waiting to go...

Speaking of Hummers, it looks like barely 15,000 Hummer EVs have been sold to date, in the 2+ years its been on the market.

Yup, lots of Serving and Protecting going on there.

As posted on the internet....

Isn’t this why Tazers were invented?