MANPADS can’t reach an aircraft flying at 30,000 feet.

(((Max Finkel)))

The Old livery would be perfect... for the UNITED NATIONS, or ISRAEL.

Gold.  Just like on the National Flags of every one of the services color guards, including the US Air Force, who owns the plane.

Author doesn’t like the President of the UNITED STATES having a plane painted in a livery using the traditional colors of the UNITED STATES, instead of the current livery which is the colors of the UNITED NATIONS and ISRAEL.

Much of what has been “consistent” in Washington DC for the last 60 years has been nothing but below the radar graft, wholesale theft, rampant drug use, and pedophilia (count the number of Congressional page scandals in recent decades using only your fingers... you can’t!).

Air Force one in UNITED NATIONS colors never should have become “iconic” in the first place.

And that gets your undies in a knot, why, exactly?

And you, too, are a moron.

Reverting it back to United nations colors would be utterly stupid.

If it’s all about him, then why isn’t his name on the side in the new AF 1 paint scheme?

Getting rid of what could be reasonably argued is a UNITED NATIONS livery for the President of the United States is a good thing, in and of itself.

Nobody elected you, idiot.

Most other countries don’t have a domestic aerospace industry.

Which was more patriotic than the one designed by some UN-glorifying desk-jockey in the USAF.

Globalism is on the way out.

Oh yes, because all of our presidents should ply in planes looking like the paint scheme was designed by a meth-addled, drunken 3-year old with some finger paints.

Welll, you know, the lack of the word *NOT* does change the previously stated position ALOT.

And you, too, reveal yourself to be a hate-filled moron.

You’re offended that the new livery is based on the colors of the United States’ flag, and no longer one based on the color of the United Nations’ flag?