dipperfromgravityfalls
DipperFromGravityFalls
dipperfromgravityfalls

If I could write a shrug, I would. Melania is getting exactly what she deserves.

I wonder how all these white people manage to get turned on by each other so bad to fuck with all these affairs and flings. They’re all about as sexually exciting as a box of instant grits.

Self cleaning is really the most important feature.

Blac chyna getting shit for clipping 3 clips on her daughters head but white people be slicing the foreskin off their baby boys for no reason? Nah.

Even if undeniable evidence came out that 45 himself actually performed the abortion on a love-fetus from an affair and consumed it with a bucket of fried chicken, half of his supporters would scream FAKE NEWS and the other half would find some contorted rationalization that he’s still the one that Gawd and Jeebus

It’s so hard because so many of the people who run the media are exactly like the accused men.

They need to do this, but in a Mystery Science Theater 3000 sort of way, with a panel of snarky women comedians making pithy comments over the “action.”

Can we stop with the Clinton shit. She is no longer news. She is not the president. She is not actively destroying our country. She is a flawed person who has made a fair amount of stupid decisions in her life. She has also been attacked relentlessly for her mistakes. And also for everything else she has ever done. It

I saw the statement in Facebook right after it was posted, didn’t even think about the SOTU. I liked the statement, I understood her reasoning and her regret. She makes no bones about the fact that hindsight is 20/20, in fact she devoted one of many paragraphs to that idea.

Holy shit, guys, Billy Bush has daughters. Daughters!

It’s a cute Metra stop, though:

I actually don’t hate the name “Chicago” for a baby on its own. It’s not my favorite but it’s by no means the worst I’ve ever heard.

I guess it depends if they could get the decision on record from the palace. The queen is famously ‘never complain, never explain’ and protective of her privacy - I can’t see the palace being eager to supply evidence that would become tabloid fodder in a civil suit..

Maybe! (disclaimer: I’m a US attorney, so just spitballing...) Here in the States, R&K could possibly argue ‘tortious (contractual) interference’. This cause of action would be, the writer adversely effected the company’s reputation, which resulted in demonstrable loss of contracts/clients. Although the company would

I thought the same thing. I was thinking she sold majority of the company so why not make some money with the book and screw the new majority holder out of the best account. She might have done it maliciously. Who’s the new majority shareholder there might be a backstory here that we don’t know.

Guys! She wasn’t fired she just is no longer welcome to peform her trade for the Queen. It’s a totally different thing!

I always like finding the warrant on regular stuff like Kellogg’s Corn Flakes or McIlhenny’s Tabasco
Takes the royals down a peg.

Thank you for the post. Jezebel pursued an open secret story inside of an industry that’s incredibly male dominated and where misogynist views (women aren’t and can’t be funny) still exist. The nature of CK’s comedy added icky complexity to the endeavor. Strong CK defenders (outside the comedy world) are to CK what

Here’s the simple fact: It’s The New York Times