you're right. ok, here's what happened in the writers' room:

seems like they wanted to address the redskins issue and just worked backwards from there.
then they missed the 'hire a lakota actor' step while doing that.

you mean it's not about jiggling some coins?

granny smith apple works really well too.

you can do that?? mansplain me some more!

but of course! but does it still count if i'm female?

just popping back in to mention that there is a difference between doing a racist thing and being a racist.
there's also a difference between being racist and being a racist.

i'm guessing a lot more than lots

ohhhh, that's right! i remember that from the superhead documentary.

LOL, "that could be true, you know."

he'd make a great president

isn't this rap, though?

ohhhh no, i did not enjoy that at all.

substance-free, that's me!

thanks, comment police!

are death threats against a president against the law?

uhhhh… yeh. 'cause you realize that white straight(presenting) men have decided these things FOR CENTURIES? that they came up with these terms (and policies) specifically to oppress communities?

look, i don't believe in reclaiming words, whether it's related to race or sex ('bitch') or identity ('dyke'). to me, it only serves few people and does a disservice to the wider community.
but it's weird when non-black people try to police black people's language. i'm not black, what right do i have to tell other…

i think he's just one of those people who thinks he's down enough with the cause to drop terms like this. i see this a lot, especially in gay and non-black POC (and conscious white) communities. they think they can just co-opt black culture and think it's cool. i remember when he had melissa harris-perry on a few…

also, the croissant.