Your IRS audit starts Monday. Enjoy!

Nearly half are not embarrassed. Nearly half are proud that the rule of law is being enforced.

The Ds have no money. From RCP this week:

Old joke.

I have no unusual issues. I made a mainstream, well-reasoned point. You called me an asshole. Who has the issues?

Not arbitrary. They mean a lot to those who have worked hard to make the team, learn the plays, practice, help teammates.

All true, I’m sure it was great for her. But why not others? Why not everyone with some kind of disability. Stop every varsity game to allow someone otherly abled to score a basket. Get a ladder if we have to.

They did. And were called special. And were told that everyone is special, which of course is untrue by definition.

Fair point.

All of those virtues are worthy, and should be pursued legitimately.

You make good points, I defer.

So you are saying no, don’t accommodate others, just this person. Why?

They are brainwashed by progressives to believe that actions like this have real meaning, when they do not. They are not smart enough to see how it diminishes their work.

I am!

The kid was happy. Others who can’t legitimately play in a HS basketball game would also love to be out there. Maybe they are in a wheelchair. Accommodate them, too? How many?

Watch the video. Everyone stood up and watched. It was not a legit play.

She did. What about the similarly situated kid who didn’t get to play? How many of these do we accommodate in this way?

How many other kids with disabilities would be thrilled to be in a real game? Should we accommodate them all?

Argument?

Least likely to have a soul, who ya got? Kryzyzewski or Belichik?