dietdrphil
DietDrPhil
dietdrphil

This thanksgiving, I am thankful for the people who keep our comments section so interesting.

Few people guessed that, but it was in fact the case.

Waiver is typically only an issue in trademark enforcement, not in copyright (that’s actually at the heart of a lot of the seemingly dopey trademark threats like when Bethesda filed a claim against the game called “scrolls”).

The reason for that is that copyright, unlike trademark, is explicitly designed for the

Actually it’s a legal usage of the act. Devs have just chosen not to enforce until now because the grey area has been to everyone’s benefit.

No, it’s not. Because in both cases, you’d know up front that the range is limited, or that only six cylinders are working. You can pay to upgrade. Or refuse the deal, and just not buy the car.

“and after I sign on the dotted line”
Nope.

The REAL problem is that the price of games has held steady at $60 despite inflation and the rising cost of game development. $60 is pretty expensive to begin with, so it’s hard to imagine that changing, but this is unsustainable!

Oh, yeah, the Confederate flag is briefly featured and it’s preettttty awkward. But most of the Terrans are portrayed as incompetent at best and outright villainous at worst, so I don’t feel like it’s necessarily a problem.

I feel like the insurance rates on an ATM full of money are probably lower than the insurance rates on an ATM with combustible material and a purpose built ignition source...

wow, what a hero -_-

I’m not Jewish. I’m Irish-Puerto Rican Catholic. But in last few months I’ve been seeing a rising tide of antisemitism on Jez. It’s sinister in its subtly. Dismissing Jewish voices, such as you are doing. You aren’t “woke” by shutting down Jewish voices even if you are Jewish, yourself. Especially when the other side

Go fuck yourself with having to jump in with your ‘it’s all the same on both sides’ bullshit. One group has a history of slavery, endemic and systemic racism, and a system designed to work against them. The other is mad they can’t be racist anymore. In case you missed it, go fuck yourself.

You are fucking high if you think this person is going to walk away from this with a “slap on the wrist”.

As a 20-something, I don’t have any idea how imminent nuclear war felt during the Cold War. Is this anything near that level of tension? I seriously have no clue.

No. Nope nope nope. Never once was her mutilation called into question. Her immigration forms were based on her lie about coming directly from Somalia, which she freely admits she was low-key advised to do as her *real* reason to flee is not politically recognized. She *was* fleeing her marriage and talking the word

This website is highly critical of people on a consistent basis for one tweet, one post, or one statement. I can recall numerous articles, posts, etc., about individuals who would otherwise be “woke” deserving harsh criticism because of such tweets, posts, statements, etc.

The tweet in question. Whatever you feel about Ayaan, her anger and her activism comes from a place of genuine suffering. And given the fact that she DID suffer from FGM, saying “she doesn’t deserve to be a woman” is gross and indefensible. Because it’s something that someone almost literally tried to inflict upon

Precisely. Glossing over her faults is dishonest journalism, and is what Jez is accusing the right of doing. We are better than this. Be clear and accurate, weigh the good and the bad. Overall, all things considered I think Linda Sarsour is a force for good, she certainly has a good heart and is supremely brave. But

Linda Sarsour quote:

there are a lot of very legitimate reasons not to like her, you mention them, but then gloss over them. She can be kind of awful but is also a victim of a right wing smear campaign at the same time, they aren’t always mutually exclusive. But saying mainstream news pointing out her occasional awfulness means it’s being