dianethehuntress
DianeTheHuntress
dianethehuntress

A spokesperson for Fetterman then gave Business Insider a frankly ridiculous statement, claiming Fetterman “strongly supports a two-state solution in Israel and Palestine, and always has” but that he “strongly believes that this resolution should include language stipulating the destruction of Hamas as a precondition

I don’t think the joke was requesting pictures, the joke was that getting visual confirmation via photograph (pics) no longer constitutes proof of an event occurring (it didn’t happen). If that description changes your opinion on the poster’s comment.

I’m usually open to off-color jokes but I don’t think non-consensual porn of any variety is OK to want or joke about wanting.

Anyone who claims they can’t do their job because of their faith should be fired on the spot. We need to stop indulging adults that believe in fairy tales.

Let’s boil Hill’s statement down to it’s core:

Boundaries are about your behavior and what you do, not about the other person. If you don’t want your girlfriend to have swimsuit photos online, you take the action to find a girlfriend who isn’t a professional surfer (or just one who doesn’t post swimsuit shots). Your boundary doesn’t proscribe your partner’s

While I do feel there are people who genuinely benefit from face-to-face interaction because they’re unable to adapt to a changing work environment (the most charitable read on that, frankly) and approach the debate in the closest thing to good faith possible, IME the arguments for forcing people to come into an

Given the delays these laws create, it's possible even a wealthy women could die before she has a chance to cross state lines. It's less likely that the stars will all align such that this happens to a woman who matters to the handful of GOP politicians with the power to do something to reverse this runaway train. But

Abortion access has never been a problem for the wealthy. This is all about what Poor people are able to do.

It’s not his first, either, the GOP is trying to push all their pet projects into this one guy’s courtroom, because they know that he doesn’t let the law get in the way of his political preferences.

Really forces one to reflect on how fucked up our system of government is that a decision this impactful is being left up to one un-elected mediocre white man.

It’s my understanding that for years, repubs have been packing the courts with favorable judges while dems were like “sure, we’ll get to that some day” and that’s how we got here. If that’s true, I am fucking furious at Dems.

Why are you always creeping on me you sad weirdo? Fuck right off

Articles about online dating are like catnip for Roger-chan. I was tempted to pass this one by but couldn’t.

I really hope someone sets tucker’s hair on fire.

The article: “It is hard for me, the writer, to match with a man who shares my values when many men are not currently engaged in the political climate and I can’t talk about my work, which is depressing, because those same men only want “good vibes” and are oblivious to the ways their ignorance contributes to the

Hey mods, do something about the fucking trolls. They don’t drive engagement, they drive it away. You ungreyed them in the first place. You can get rid of them, too.

“The system worked” is code for “my side won and yours didn’t”. Prosecutors say it as well. Shamelessly.

J-ef-C THIS.
People need to get this before opening their pie-holes with patronizing advice or status-quo-reinforcing minimizing.

It’s also hard as a young woman to listen to your instincts. If you have doubts about a guy, people will just brush off your concerns. As a young woman, I met this guy, he wanted to take me out. He was well dressed, clean, polite and from a good family ...every parents idea of a nice boy. I wanted to cancel and run,