dholmestar
dholmestar
dholmestar

You do know he’s not dead, right?

One, this man wasn’t a public figure. Two, the issue for many wasn’t as much the trick, as it was the outing, and outing is generally seen as something that is morally the wrong thing to do, especially for a non-public figure. Three, Gawker was helping a guy who was blackmailing the subject. This was much more than a

It’s a lovely little story, and it sounds like he was a nice guy in person-but all of this is in extremely poor taste.

Your hero is a man who promotes reddit level doxxing and homophobia of a man solely because he works for a different company?

I read it. I’m sure Tommy Craggs is nice to his friends and kind to animals. But that doesn’t excuse the egregious (and that’s too mild a word) ethical travesty that transpired, that Craggs is partially responsible for, and that no one on the Gawker Media editorial staff seems to want to acknowledge. There have been

So, is it your opinion that Craggs tied his dick to a rock and threw it off a cliff? Or that he tied his dick to a rock and then jumped off a cliff?

I really hate this running theme in all of the Gawker posts about how all of the outside criticism is coming from MRA’s/Gamergaters/Generic Reddit Trolls. Even former writers like Adam Weinstein and Lindy West cant help but bring it up almost compulsively. Everyone seems so enchanted by the victimhood of having the

I mean maybe they use other things but really, this doesn’t reflect what you’re trying to get across.

Conveniently left out the part where he was being fucking blackmailed by a guy...

All I get from this is that he’s a monster who keeps his read receipts on.

yeah, this screenshot is a pretty weird thing to post when the aim is to show how good of buds you were...

So you only correspond every 6 months?

“Years later, David Geithner’s children would look back on the day that ruined their family forever and remark that it wasn’t a total loss - ‘a bunch of awful people realized the value of friendship, at least.’ ”

This is a good story and the sentiments are laudable and understandable. But nobody is laying mushroom clouds on Gawker. Somebody inside Gawker's own office did that when they hit “Publish” thinking they were laying a mushroom cloud on Conde Nast.

Look how I cam point you to Google “Azteca” AND “urine”

There is no international team I hate more, and it’s solely because of the fans. They are a bunch of trash and urine throwing jabronis, and they are proud of it. It’s like if Philly fans had a national team.

Fuck Mexico fans. I know there have been a very small amount of issues with US fans doing this, but they shit they get away with at stadiums is disgraceful. They were throwing shit at Costa Rican players after that shit call. Against T&T there garbage was hailing on the guy taking the corner before they scored the

I heard Capcom delt with this attitude of 3D only from Sony back then, they had to say “you want Resident Evil, you take Megaman 8 & X4” ...I’m not directly quoting but it’s really painful to see all this anti-2D stuff when that stuff aged far far better than any of the 3D stuff of that era.

I never got that Crash had anything wrong with his brain.

You do realize it’s part of Gawker Media and Deadspin writers work for Gawker Media, and Deadspin cross posts posts on Gawker to their front page and vice versa, right?