RIGHT?! Someone will need to prove this isn’t them, because holy shit.

Given the preponderance of that word in rap and that he was adlibbing to a rap song... uh, no?

lol did he say it was in the song? Nope.

Stop using “progressive” like it is a bad thing. It isn’t. There are those who want to expand government (authoritarian) and those who don’t (libertarian). This exists independent of if they are progressive or conservative.

It isn’t a fight. It would be a slaughter. They control so many layers of life, consolidated over the last century and a half, it would take a major collapse to truly shift them from their ivory towers. Try fighting and you will get met with force you can’t match - the National Guard, the operator-esque modern police…

This really is one of the better series out there right now. I absolutely love it.

Good work. Had you just said “CNN’s Santorum Problem”, the connotation would have been much less clear.

And yet here we are at a point in time where the wealthy are actually insulated from retribution. They control the gov’t on so many levels, including the military and federal agencies alllllllll the way down to local police. On top of hired hands they have access to.

Literally the next article down from this one was a KinjaDeals post. Too funny.

I don’t care what Congress did 40+ years ago. This Congress of GOP idiots are all fucking hawks. Even some Dems are too. We don’t have a mainstream peace party.

Unless they are bottom rung enlisted, they have commanded to some degree. I get your intent (service creating a sense of gravity for military action), and while I agree, it is just hard to tell what we are in for.

You are aware that the President can authorize limited military action, right? That this can then force Congress to go further even if they wouldn’t have done so? Especially if it was timed say right before a Midterm that would see most GOP members ousted from Congress. Because right now Congress will vote for war,…

The first part, sure. The second? No thanks. I don’t want Generals in charge. Lest we wind up with a MacArthur instead of an Eisenhower.

Think before you go to war and have provisions in place to prevent idiots not thinking.

This is the kind of fatkid indulgence strategic thinking I can get behind!

That looks absolutely fucking fantastic!

Not even unintentionally. Libertarianism still retains governance and society. It wouldn’t look vastly different than how things look now, with just a different guiding philosophy behind decisions.

Uh, yeah I do. And Libertarians are not anarchists. You want to actually refute that or just going to make another stupid post?